Before I address this case I will say this to a man named roland in the video attached.
Roland refers to the black bible here.
Okay.
On that note I'll say this.
Jesus, in matthew 5: 17 to 20 endorces slavery as a proper procedure for humans.
In this life.always..so?
I'm just curious?
What does roland say to that statement?
Jesus is wrong there?
In the christian bible?
Hmmnn?
Lets see now?
Hmmnn?
Says roland.
To that statement.
Wha? Who? Where? Why? When? How? Which way? Wha?
Rollie is wonderous? Above jesus? Ya say?
Okay.
Whatever sir roland.
You think about that statement.
Roland.
But anyways,
Whatever.
Now to get to the buisness at hand.
This video.
And on that note
Let's clarify something. First off.
I want to say something first off on that note.
lets be fair.
In most cases on Roland's youtube station " I admit" roland is right.
These white people roland is monitoring are out of control.
And these white folks roland is monitoring here are out of line.
It takes two to tangle.
And a lot of these white folk are being disrespectful.
And provocateurs.
If you will?
If I may use that term?
Politely?
So" in a lot of cases I wish roland to know that I am on his side.
Yet" unfortunately" in some cases " their are flaws with Roland's statements.
And this video here is a prime example of that.
Especially on the matter of pEople claiming that it's impossible this woman is speaking truth.
It's not impossible that shes speaking truth.
What shes saying.
But roland wont admit that.
Here.
Neither will anyone else.
I'll grant you this
Though.
She was foolish.
For chasing him.
This black man.
She chased.
Maybe she had a secret desire to worship the black man.
And be close to him
And this was the only way she could Express it.
So this white woman stupidly passionately chased the black man.
O my?
But the evidence also implies their is a possibility he was psychologically disoriented...
Their also seems to be conflicting statements in this case that seemingly imply he had consumed some alcohol.
Ad up those factors and " it becomes clear" that this woman was doing her civic duty in trying to stop an incapacitated driver from killing someone.
That is an american law.
And anyone familiar with the last episode of seinfeld would admit that.
A certain american law states that " within reason" if a citizen feels he or she can stop a crime from being committed then the law states that citizen must undertake that duty.
To not do so amounts to a serious charge.
Therefore the woman in this video was clearly doing her civic duty in trying to stop a dangerous incapacitated individual from driving a car.
Clearly that's the case.
Why is no one coming to this womans defence and admitting this obvious truth?
Roland?
Are you deliberately lying again?
Are you prejudiced against whites?
Like most blacks on your program are?
Come now?
Roland?
You can admit it?
Also " anyone who says this 62 year old black man's finger could not have possibly pulled the trigger of the gun in this womans hand " regarding such a situation" is clearly not speaking truth either.
On this subject.
Think people.
The woman is frightened.
But she feels obligated to obey americas stupid laws.
So she stupidly chases the black man.
To stop him from possibly killing someone.
While the black man is driving a car in a disoriented state.
Once the white woman catches up to the black man she approaches him in the seat of his car and " while holding the gun" falls into him accidentally.
Then" in a atruggle" for the gun" somehow his finger gets attached to the trigger of the gun.
Obviously then he stupidly pulls the trigger.
After pulling and turning the gun so its directed at him.
While the stupid woman is now in shock.
And the stupid woman doesnt know how to explain that.
In her dumb state and his stupor state.
It is possible. That this happened.
Roland " I'm not saying this is the case for sure.
What I'm saying is " it is possible it did happen that way.
And their is not enough evidence to completely suggest it didnt happen that way.
That's all im saying.
Bro. Okay?.
The woman was silly to try to obey the new law of america obviously in chasing down this black man.
In such a case.
It's TRUE.
But in reality" that doesnt alter the fact this white woman isnt really the one who broke an american law here.
When all the facts are analysed properly.
Clearly shes innocent.
It's the black man who is guilty here.
That's completely obvious.
Why no one can see that obvious truth except for me is pretty amazing.
What is wrong with everyone evaluating this case?
Of course it is a possibility things happened the way this woman says it did.
Regarding this case.
And american law also says "" innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Wherein
There is no irerefutable evidence that proves this woman is irrefutably guilty in this case.
That's obvious.
Therefore roland what do you say to that???
Hmmnnn?
Can you admit the obvious?
In such a case?
Roland?
Yes?
My goodness.
Goodness GRACIOUS me o my.?
Or
No?
Maybe?
Roland?
Hmmnn?
Even if jesus said this woman is innocent" people wouldnt believe jesus.
Because people " and especially racist black people" who are against white people "no matter what"" have already made up their mind " this white woman is guilty.
And even if GOD said this white woman is innocent" for trying to prevent a deranged black man from drinking and driving and then possibly killing someone"""
Black people today"" would spit in Gods Face and say "" FUCK YOU!! GOD!!"🧟♂️🦍🔥🐷😅🧟♂️🤪🤡🤡😅🦧🤩😗🤣⚡😍🔥🧟♂️😱🤪🌋🐒🤩😅🐒🦍🦧🐵🐒🐷🦍🦧🐷🦧🐮🦍🐒🐶🐒🐵🐷🐵🐷🐒🦍🐺🐮
And on that note I now rationally say this.
On this subject.
THERES NO POSSIBLE WAY THIS WHITE WOMAN WAS PULLED TOWARDS THEBLACK MAN" WHO THEN TWISTED THIS WOMANS ARM IN A WAY WHERE THE GUN WAS POINTED AT HIM.
THEN HE GOT HIS FINGER ON THE TRIGGER AND FIRED THE GUN.
SHOOTING HIMSELF!!!
THATS TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!
ESPECIALLY SINCE THIS BLACK MAN WAS CLEARLY DRUNK OUT OF HIS MIND.
No drunk person whose completely inebriated out of his mind would use masculine strength to do that to a woman.
OF COURSE THATS IMPOSSIBLE GOD!!""
Especially connected to luke 1: 37!!!
BLACK PEOPLE OF TODAYS AGE WOULD SCREAM AT GOD.
AND SCREAM AT JESUS TOO.
BECAUSE THATS HOW DEVILISH BLACKS ARE TODAY.
THEIR RIGHT.
AND GOD JESUS AND EVERYONE ELSE ARE WRONG.
EXACTLY.
EXACTLY.
Roland?
I've written out the facts of this case.
Here.
In 100 websites.
I've written.
Which rebukes evil pieces of spiritual shit.
Like you.
Okay?
In esotericspirits.blogspot.com
So?
If you delete this message?
You still havent stopped me.
From addressing truth.
Regarding deceptive black people today.
Who hate good white people for no good reason.
Go fuck yourself.
Roland.
Come the christian day of judgment? When we stand before jesus?
I'll kick your cursed ass.
Bye.
Goof.
Now you can delete this comment.
You cursed fuckhead.
Roland.
But remember.
Remember what I just said.
Bye.
Sir roland.
Yes.
Toddle llooo.
For now.
Yes.
For now.
P.s.
My best friend in this life was a black man.
And a better friend I never had.
Why?
Because that black man wasnt an asshole like you.
Roland.
Kootos!!!!
Now you can delete this comment. And message.
Okay.?
Roland.?
In connection to luke 12: 1 to 3.
You sweet negroe.
You.
Bye.
Why?
Now on to another case.
From Sweden.
Addressed here.
Worded ASFOLLOWS.
As usual' humanity for the majority ' is once again ' backwards regarding true honorable justice.
Consider the real obvious facts of this case.
Do not hypocritically lie.
Speak truth.
First
Joanna's ex ' the so called peter?
Telling joanna to get an abortion?
That's just rudely telling a woman to kill a baby.
And Emma?
She knew full well' that her abortion pills were murdering babies too.
While Emma choose to cause chaos by using sex and fornications to come between joanna and peter.
Everything CHRISTIANITYS HOLY SPIRIT teaches humans through jesus'in relation to what was just said 'completely justifies joanna as the virtuous person in this love triangle .
Gone loonie.
Joanna was the only one in this love triangle wo didnt want to
participate in it.
For reasons of decency.
And any man who ridiculously tells a young lady to murder a human enfant through an abortion 'should be drawn and quartered.
It's been proven factually that human ENFANTS are torn apart during an abortion.
It's also in general' the same result' when women use birth control pills.
The unborn fetus is ripped apart.
Physically.
And the baby feels such horrific pain.
So?
Peter's an asshole for telling an impressionable young lady to kill an infant like that.
His.
No less.
And Emma?
She continually approved of murdering little helpless babies in that fashion .
Regarding abortions.
Devils do that.
Evil devils kill human babies.
And then continue to kill babies over and over for the sake of perverted sexual pleasures.
Wtf?
In connection to matthew 5: 17 to 20' jeremiah 48: 10 '' luke 6: 26'' and exodus 32: 9 to 27 if you want to be honest and literal about this situation '
Joanna is not really the guilty party here.
Contrary to what everyone else thinks.
Clearly peter and Emma are the guilty parties.
As the israeli prophetess judith so righteously did with corrupt evil people with a sword 'connected to jeremiah 48: 10 and matthew 5: 17'' so''' so too did joanna do the same.
But' technically joanna should have just righteously drawn and quartered the two baby torturers and human baby killers.
I mean' I want to he merciful where mercy is proper.
But are you people readingthetrue facts?
Here?
🌠☄🤡🤪😅🤣🧟♂️🔥🌋😋🐶🌊🌈🐷😗👍👌🤩🐒⚡🥳😀😲🙋♂️🙏👾😍😱🌠🤪🤡☄🐶🤣🤡🐶🌊😋😋🤡☄🤣🤡🤣😅🔥🙏👾👾😱🥳😀🙋♂️🙋♂️🌈⚡🐷🐒😗🤩👍👌🌠☄🤡😅🤣🔥🐶🌊🌈😗🐒🤩😀😀😱🤪🤣😅🤡😱🥳👌🤩🐒😗🤡😅🤣🤪😅🌋🔥🧟♂️☄🌊🐶😋🤣😱🥳😀⚡👌👍😗🌈🤪🤡🌊👍😗🌈⚡🐒🤩👌🙋♂️😲🥳😍🙏🤣🔥🤡😅😗🤩🐒🌠🤪🤡🤪🤡☄
Be merciful to people who tear human ENFANTS apart.
And falsely condemn an honorable young woman whose trying to honor what christianity decently teaches humans in genesis 1: 27.
Ooo okay?
So?
Joanna had some horses.
Connected to this.
EASYTRUELOVE.BLOGSPOT.COM
Didnt she?
No comments:
Post a Comment