I went over the facts. 🤡regarding rachel mae buffett.
Summary is as follows.
I went over the facts.
Maybe she slightly accidentally gave incorrect information because she got flustered.
Because police were interrogating her mercilessly.
And pressing her.
But in no way at all did rachel deliberately
Give police false information.
If she did?
Show me.
Where?
Where did it happen?.go though the facts in detail.
I went through the facts of this case.
And I didnt see it.
None of the facts I've read' relating to this case" confirm rachel deliberately lied to police.
She definitely got caught off guard.
By a chaotic situation she wasnt expecting. Which unfolded in front of her.
Against her will.
But she never really deliberately lied to cops about anything.
Look at the facts closely.
What I just said is irrefutably true.
So... sentencing her to jail?
In a situation like this?
That's hypocrisy on the part of authorities involved in this case.
Irrefutably it is.
Shes not guilty of deliberately lying to cops.
That's obvious.
Ya callous kangaroo cops.
Man.
This world sure has some corrupt courts.
Eh?
As I prove here.
Ouranus.blogspot.com
The facts of this case " thoroughly decree" that Rachel Buffett was innocent.
So?
Wtf did the police come down on her for?
So hard?
She clearly didnt plan any crime attributed to Wozniak at all.
Clearly.
She clearly was ● not ● an accessory after the fact.
In any way at all.
It's clear she had no idea what the fuck daniel Wozniak was doing...
Regarding this crime.
Shes clearly innocent of being an accessory after the fact.
In no way at all did she go out of her way to impede the police investigation either.
Summary everything properly.
Clearly shes innocent of any crime.
So the cops hypocritically condemned her.
For no reason.
At all.
Assholish cops.
And so did that corrupt court.
Almost 3 years in prison?
For being clearly innocent?
Ya know....sentencing Rachel to nearly 3 years in prison for not really being guilty of anything ....
I'll tell ya..
That's basically worse then anything dan did here.
Especially when it's clear the army fella dan killed?
That army guy had clearly killed an innocent man around 8 years earlier!!
So" theirs a lot of injustices being done all around this charade of shit case..
Wtf?
Set rachel free right now.
In no way at all did she plan any of this.
And every fact presented in this case clearly verifies she cooperated with police from the start of this investigation to its conclusion.
So they condemn her for that?
Fuck off.
Goofy authorities.
She did nothing wrong!!!
Shes CLEARLY INNOCENT OF ANY CRIME HERE.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY!!!!!!!!!!
Ya fucking goofs.
So set her free.
And clear her record.
Ya
Fucking morons.
RIGHT NOW!!!
None of the facts I've read' relating to this case" confirm rachel deliberately lied to police.
She definitely got caught off guard.
By a chaotic situation she wasnt expecting. Which unfolded in front of her.
Against her will.
But she never really deliberately lied to cops about anything.
Look at the facts closely.
What I just said is irrefutably true.
So... sentencing her to jail?
In a situation like this?
That's hypocrisy on the part of authorities involved in this case.
Irrefutably it is.
Shes not guilty of deliberately lying to cops.
That's obvious.
Ya callous kangaroo cops.
Man.
This world sure has some corrupt courts.
Eh?
As I prove here.
Ouranus.blogspot.com
The facts of this case " thoroughly decree" that Rachel Buffett was innocent.
So?
Wtf did the police come down on her for?
So hard?
She clearly didnt plan any crime attributed to Wozniak at all.
Clearly.
She clearly was ● not ● an accessory after the fact.
In any way at all.
It's clear she had no idea what the fuck daniel Wozniak was doing...
Regarding this crime.
Shes clearly innocent of being an accessory after the fact.
In no way at all did she go out of her way to impede the police investigation either.
Summary everything properly.
Clearly shes innocent of any crime.
So the cops hypocritically condemned her.
For no reason.
At all.
Assholish cops.
And so did that corrupt court.
Almost 3 years in prison?
For being clearly innocent?
Ya know....sentencing Rachel to nearly 3 years in prison for not really being guilty of anything ....
I'll tell ya..
That's basically worse then anything dan did here.
Especially when it's clear the army fella dan killed?
That army guy had clearly killed an innocent man around 8 years earlier!!
So" theirs a lot of injustices being done all around this charade of shit case..
Wtf?
Set rachel free right now.
In no way at all did she plan any of this.
And every fact presented in this case clearly verifies she cooperated with police from the start of this investigation to its conclusion.
So they condemn her for that?
Fuck off..
Goofy authorities.
She did nothing wrong!!!
Shes CLEARLY INNOCENT OF ANY CRIME HERE.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY!!!!!!!!!!
Ya fucking goofs.
So set her free.
And clear her record.
Ya
Fucking morons.
RIGHT NOW!!!
The facts of this case " thoroughly decree" that Rachel Buffett was innocent.
So?
Wtf did the police come down on her for?
So hard?
She clearly didnt plan any crime attributed to Wozniak at all.
Clearly.
She clearly was ● not ● an accessory after the fact.
In any way at all.
It's clear she had no idea what the fuck daniel Wozniak was doing...
Regarding this crime.
Shes clearly innocent of being an accessory after the fact.
In no way at all did she go out of her way to impede the police investigation either.
Summary everything properly.
Clearly shes innocent of any crime.
So the cops hypocritically condemned her.
For no reason.
At all.
Assholish cops.
And so did that corrupt court.
Almost 3 years in prison?
For being clearly innocent?
Ya know....sentencing Rachel to nearly 3 years in prison for not really being guilty of anything ....
I'll tell ya..
That's basically worse then anything dan did here.
Especially when it's clear the army fella dan killed?
That army guy had clearly killed an innocent man around 8 years earlier!!
So" theirs a lot of injustices being done all around this charade of shit case..
Wtf?
Set rachel free right now.
In no way at all did she plan any of this.
And every fact presented in this case clearly verifies she cooperated with police from the start of this investigation to its conclusion.
So they condemn her for that?
Fuck off.
Goofy authorities.
She did nothing wrong!!!
Shes CLEARLY INNOCENT OF ANY CRIME HERE.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY!!!!!!!!!!
Ya fucking goofs.
So set her free.
I went over the facts.
Maybe she slightly accidentally gave incorrect information because she got flustered.
Because police were interrogating her mercilessly.
And pressing her.
But in no way at all did rachel deliberately
Give police false information.
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
If she did? IF SHE DID DO THAT?
THEN
Show me... SHOW ME. SHE GOT FLUSTTERED. ITS TRUE. AND MADE SOME UNINTENTIONAL ERRS IN HOW SHE PERCEIVED THINGS TO BE.
ITS TRUE
BUT' LETS FACE IT.
SHE NEVER DELIBERATELY GAVE FALSE INFORMATION. TO ANYBODY.
WHEN SHE FINALLY REALIZED WHAT WAS HAPPENING THOUGH... AND WAS CLEAR ON EVERYTHING" SHE THEN TOLD THE POLICE THE TRUTH.
BUT HOW COULD SHE TELL THE POLICE THE TRUTH OF THIS MATTER?
RIGHT AWAY?
WHEN SHE WASNT AT ALL AWARE OF WHAT DANIEL WAS DOING?
OR HAD DONE?
SO?
THE PLLICE CLEARLY DELIBERATELY MERCILESSLY CALLOUSLY ENTRAPPED HER.
AND SHE BECAME CONFUSED.
WHAT GOOFS.
THE COPS ARE.
FOR DOING THAT.
TO AN INNOCENT WOMAN.
SHE CLEARLY NEVER DELIBERATELY LIED TO THE POLICE.
THOUGH.
AND IF SHE DID?
SHOW ME?
Where?
Where did it happen?.go though the facts in detail.
I went through the facts of this case.
And I didnt see it.
None of the facts I've read' relating to this case" confirm rachel deliberately lied to police.
She definitely got caught off guard.
By a chaotic situation she wasnt expecting. Which unfolded in front of her.
Against her will.
But she never really deliberately lied to cops about anything.
Look at the facts closely.
What I just said is irrefutably true.
So... sentencing her to jail?
In a situation like this?
That's hypocrisy on the part of authorities involved in this case.
Irrefutably it is.
Shes not guilty of deliberately lying to cops.
That's obvious.
Ya callous kangaroo cops.
Man.
This world sure has some corrupt courts.
Eh?
As I prove here.
Ouranus.blogspot.com
The facts of this case " thoroughly decree" that Rachel Buffett was innocent.
So?
Wtf did the police come down on her for?
So hard?
She clearly didnt plan any crime attributed to Wozniak at all.
Clearly.
She clearly was ● not ● an accessory after the fact.
In any way at all.
It's clear she had no idea what the fuck daniel Wozniak was doing...
Regarding this crime.
Shes clearly innocent of being an accessory after the fact.
In no way at all did she go out of her way to impede the police investigation either.
Summary everything properly.
Clearly shes innocent of any crime.
So the cops hypocritically condemned her.
For no reason.
At all.
Assholish cops.
And so did that corrupt court.
Almost 3 years in prison?
For being clearly innocent?
Ya know....sentencing Rachel to nearly 3 years in prison for not really being guilty of anything ....
I'll tell ya..
That's basically worse then anything dan did here.
Especially when it's clear the army fella dan killed?
That army guy had clearly killed an innocent man around 8 years earlier!!
🏁
So" theirs a lot of injustices being done all around this charade of shit case..
Wtf?
Set rachel free right now.
In no way at all did she plan any of this.
And every fact presented in this case clearly verifies she cooperated with police from the start of this investigation to its conclusion.
So they condemn her for that?
Fuck off.
I've analysed the case closely a few times.
I failed to see where she deliberately committed perjury.
No where did she deliberately factually commit perjury.
And no where did rachel factually plan a murder.
At all.
Maybe rachel got caught off guard by her boyfriends insane actions.
By which factor she might have mistakenly given police incorrect information.
Regarding Daniel's actions.
After the murders daniel committed took place
That's possible.
But no where at all is there any real evidence that rachel deliberately knowingly committed perjury.
Or lied to the police.
And no where at all is there any evidence which would impute that rachel planned to murder anyone with her husband.
Either.
As some idiotic cops have tried to claim.
Wheres that evidence?
No where is their evidence that this woman is guilty of any crime at all..
Guilty by bat shit association.
That's what rachel is guilty of.
And rachel didnt know daniel was bat shit crazy.
Either.
So that's really not her mistake either.
In fact...
If you want to get literal?
Every fact related to this case proves the police involved in this case committed perjury atrociously with criminal intent against rachel buffett.
And of a truth" the police who charged her with perjury should be locked up and given the maximum time allowed by law.
Just for the record.
Callous cops.
Do your jobs right.
The woman is clearly innocent of any crime.
As far as every obvious fact related to this case confirms.
There is literally no evidence at all that rachel committed perjury.
And when the case was finally brought to court and presented that TRURH was obvious.
Prosecutors presented no real evidence that rachel ever deliberately lied to the police.
That's obvious.
Rachel became confused.
And possibly gave a conflicting incorrect statement to police when she got caught off guard by her husband's deranged actions.
Because Daniel's actions were Corrupt actions that she knew nothing about.
So?
If your a decent person and you dont know that your fiance just psychotically killed two people then do you think you might get caught off guard a bit and a bit flustered by police questions on such a matter?
Of course a decent sane person might not respond perfectly to such crazy questions right off the hop.
No rational jury or judge or court or police official can logically hold that against rachel.
So?
Why did the courts hold that against her?
That's an
Imbecilic american judicial system.
So what the hell is going on here?
Accurately stated what this is " is actually a pathetic
kangaroo court of idiotic judicial authority figures who are laughably worse in dictating appropriate justice in a courtroom then even the queen of hearts judicial system located in the child hood fairy tale entitled alice in wonderland...
Koo koo koo koo.
Another court case is wrapped up? Eh? Okay.
Dummies.
Well?
Cheers to that "" say court officials .
Let's all pat ourselves on each others backs for managing to exercise another pathetic judgment which clearly works against justice.
Hmmm?
Woe yes.
Now....
How about a round of golf?
Shall we? Aw yes.
Exactly.
Sounds tiggerishly great!!!
See you on the golf course.?
For sure .
Bye!!
Goofy authorities.
She did nothing wrong!!!🌞
Shes CLEARLY INNOCENT OF ANY CRIME HERE.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY.
CLEARLY!!!!!!!!!!
Ya fucking goofs.
So set her free.
And clear her record.
Ya
Fucking morons.
RIGHT NOW!!!
And clear her record.
Ya
Fucking morons.
RIGHT NOW!!!
P.s.
Also.
I wish to say this.
Regarding this case.
For hypothetical reasons.
Daniel was pressured by debts .
And he also owed back rent.
And he also getting married with no money.
The poor fella obviously made a mistake.
He flipped out.
And made some crucial errors.
For money.
It's unfortunate.
But a lot of people have fallen into that trap.
It's not just him.
I dont condone it.
But wozniak ain't the only one to ever make that mistake.
Something no one ever mentions though.
The army fella dan killed?
Sam herr?
Sam herr killed an innocent man eight years earlier.
And got off on a technicality.
This fella steve herr? Sam's father?
Never mentions that.
He talks a lot.
About how guilty rachel buffett is.
When in reality its THOROUFHLY obvious rachel is not guilty of anything.
In this case.
And he also talks a lot
About how gloriously righteous his son is.
But steve herr?
Steve never mentions the fact that sam herr killed an innocent man 8 years earlier to the date of Sam's death at the hAnds of dan.
Just thought I'd mention that.
I wonder would would say to the family of the man sam herr killed?
Would he say
""Hey guys? How are ya? Did ya know my son " sam is an abominable murderer?"
Is that what steve herr would say? Hey? I'm just curious.
It's just a question.
While steve herr condemns dan wozniak up and down for murder.
Perhaps " if dan had killed sam " 9 years earlier then the mourning family of the man sam herr killed wouldnt be crying and weeping sorrowfully for the loss of their son every day.
Hey?
That is just a hypothetical question.
Relax everyone.
Were just debating what could have been.
Right?
Right.
Exactly.
Yes.
Exactly.
In truth.
Woe?
Okay.
So
To reiterate the preceding information addressed let's summarize the case of rachel mae buffett and dan wozniak.
Once and for all.
As follows.
Easytruelove.blogspot.com
Summarizing real facts. Properly.
Sam killed an innocent man 8 years previously to himself being killed by dan wozniak.
It's in the records. If people check.
Yet sam got off.
On a technicality.
And sam and his dad steve laughed about it.
That's actually factual.
Cool eh?
I wonder if the family of the innocent man sam killed thinks justice was served? Here?
It's just a question.
So?
I know this first statement I'm making is probably irrelevant " I suppose" to the basic judicial elements of american law specifically.
Yet I do wonder if anyone has ever keyed in the fact that the man dan wozniak killed was himself guilty of killing an innocent man 8 years prior to his own murder.
I find it interesting that the father of that man" who so vehemently condemned rachel for being guilty of a crime she clearly had nothing to do with" never once brought up the fact that his son took an innocent man's life 8 years earlier.
Does matthew 5: 17 to 20 matter here.
To that very evil father?
I call him evil for just reasons.
Mocking christianitys holy spirit in such manners is basically detestable.
And that man clearly does that.
Here.
But what he does in that context human courts do not consider.
Now...
.still the law of moses is logical.
An eye for an eye.
But whatever.
'Ive analysed the case closely a few times.
I fail to see where she deliberately committed perjury.
No where did she deliberately factually commit perjury.
And no where did rachel factually plan a murder.
At all.
Maybe rachel got caught off guard by her boyfriends insane actions.
By which factor she might have mistakenly given police incorrect information.
Regarding Daniel's actions.
After the murders daniel committed took place
That's possible.
But no where at all is there any real evidence that rachel deliberately knowingly committed perjury.
Or lied to the police.
Willingly.
The woman was clearly railroaded and caught off guard by strange questions the police began to ask her when she clearly had no idea what was really going on.
She mistakenly gave an incorrect statement to the police that she basically thought was accurate and that she clearly thought was correct.
If the facts of the case are looked at closely that is irrefutably correct.
There was clearly no prevarication or malicious INTENT there.
And no where at all is there any evidence which would impute that rachel planned to murder anyone with her husband.
Either.
As some idiotic cops have tried to claim.
Wheres that evidence?
No where is their evidence that this woman is guilty of any crime at all..
Guilty by bat shit association.
Unfortunately
That's what rachel is guilty of.
To a husband who quite possibly lapsed into a temporary state of complete neuralgia.
When he committed these crimes.
Tortured by the fact he had debts proceeding to come at him from all angles.
And on that note it should be noted that there is a strong possibility " when he committed these killings dan wozniak was temporarily insane.
At that point rachel didnt know her fiancee daniel was bat shit crazy.
Either.
So that's really not her mistake either.
In fact...
I'm not saying dan wozniak was irrefutably crackers at the time he committed the murders.
I'm saying it's simply a possibility he was.
The actions didnt go in line with his regular character. At all.
Yet that is not Rachel's fault.
Because she obviously didnt notice her fiancee had lapsed into a temporary state of psychosis at the time.
Furthermore
If you want to get literal?
It should also be noted here'that
Every fact related to this case also basically proves likewise that the police involved in this case committed perjury atrociously with criminal intent against rachel buffett.
And of a truth" the police who charged her with perjury should be locked up and given the maximum time allowed by law.
Just for the record.
Callous cops.
Do your jobs right.
The woman is clearly innocent of any crime.
As far as every obvious fact related to this case confirms.
There is literally no evidence at all that rachel committed perjury.
And when the case was finally brought to court and presented that TRUTH was obvious.
Prosecutors presented no real evidence that rachel ever deliberately lied to the police.
That's obvious.
Rachel became confused.
And possibly gave a conflicting incorrect statement to police when she got caught off guard by her husband's deranged actions.
Because Daniel's actions were Corrupt actions that she knew nothing about.
So?
If your a decent person and you dont know that your fiance just psychotically killed two people then do you think you might get caught off guard a bit and a bit flustered by police questions on such a matter?
Of course a decent sane person might not respond perfectly to such crazy questions right off the hop.
No rational jury or judge or court or police official can logically hold that against rachel.
So?
Why did the courts hold that against her?
That's an
Imbecilic american judicial system.
So what the hell is going on here?
Accurately stated what this is " is actually a pathetic
kangaroo court of idiotic judicial authority figures who are laughably worse in dictating appropriate justice in a courtroom then even the queen of hearts judicial system located in the child hood fairy tale entitled alice in wonderland...
Koo koo koo koo.
Another court case is wrapped up? Eh? Okay.
Dummies.
Well?
""Cheers to that "" say court officials .
Let's all pat ourselves on each others backs for managing to exercise another pathetic judgment which clearly works against justice.
Hmmm?
Woe yes.
Now....
How about a round of golf?
Shall we? Aw yes.
Exactly.
Sounds tiggerishly great!!!
See you on the golf course.?
For sure .
Bye!!
No comments:
Post a Comment