To begin this website on a study in crimes committed in America and on earth in general first note this here and now.
Evaluating? Studying? Analysing?
Regarding dna?Wait a second? Hold the phone.Look closely at this information and tell me what you see?Specifically?
I’ve come across some matters that concern me.
That, I feel, need to be addressed.
Worded as follows.
First off let me bring the readers attention to the following subject scenario.
A man by the name of Xavier DuPont?
And the basic situation related to that individual.
Worded as follows.
In connection with this.
https://youtu.be/JwBYyQG8X8Y
https://easytruelove.blogspot.com/2021/01/approximately-13- 52-mark-of-this-video.html 👿😃🦊🙀🤔😱😯🧟♂️👺🐒🧝♀️🤪
The guy they had " in custody? In this li k or rather YouTube video I link here?
Who they thought was Xavier Dupont because his finger prints matched xavier Duponts finger prints with police records
on people's finger prints turned out not to be Xavier dupont?
Because the guys dna didnt match Xavier's?
So? Let me get this straight?
Despite the fact they had a suspect who looked like xavier and despite the fact that suspects finger prints matched Xavier's finger prints on record :
Despite that information addresssed,
The police in this case just let the guy go?
Because the dna didnt match Xavier's dna on record?
Did you just hear what i just said?
There?
At approximately the 5 minute mark of this video ?
A YouTuber named
Micheal says what exactly?
He says exactly that.
So?
Wtf?
Ya know what?
Yep.
I heard that statement correctly.
In connection with this link here?
https://youtu.be/BYq428kO6Do?si=DzxqX3fHjrLlNhXA
That's the third tape I've come accross weird statements in crime cases that may impute that dna testing is not as concrete in evidence to hold against a suspect in a crime as police make it out to be.
In other words?
Regarding this video?
If the guy looked like xavier?
To the point where everyone was convinced it was him?
And his finger prints matched police file fingerprints which police possess?
Then obviously the guy was the man wanted in this case.
Meaning xavier dupont.
Okay.
And hes probably laughing his head off right now.
In some hidden spot on earth.
Thanking satan for the faulty police procedure of testing the dna of suspects to confirm someone's identity.
Well?
Thats what the facts of the video here just said in particular.
So what does that mean specifically?
Huh?
That’s a very good question folks.
And just for the record?
I've come accross two other cases similar to this.
Which clearly indicates " in some cases" dna testing is a flawed police procedure in confirming someone's real identity.
I cant recall the previous two cases.
Exactly.
At the moment.
But I swear I saw such cases.
And they also were similar in nature to the flawed case just mentioned
Regarding
Xavier DuPont.
Irrefutably.I believe the two cases had to do with police mislabelling and mishandling dna samples.WhenThe judges in such cases heard that information they threw such cases out.
If I find those two videos I'll put them here.
In this comment.
Yet anyways
I suspect recordings of such information on the possible flaws located in dna testing are in this website
Easytruelove.blogspot.com
Though.
Yet
Just for the sake of record.
Thnik about it.
Closely.
People.
DNA testing would obviously possess a certain level of flaws or imperfections in identifying someone because luke 3: 8 to 9 is written.
Regarding Christianity too.
That's not the only reason.
But it's a logical one.
That means that " finger printing is a way more rational outlet to identifying whether or not you have your suspect.
In a criminal case.
Pure and simple.
Obviously that statement is correct.
Now I’m certain dna testing may have some precedence in ascertaining who’s guilty of a crime.
I quess.
Maybe?
But as it stands right now?
It’s not a fool proof way of ascertaining whether someone is guilty of a crime or not.
And the preceding information I just addressed is proof of the accuracy of that statement.
Obviously it is.
Look at the facts.
That’s irrefutably obvious.
Pure and simple
Why?
Because the intangibles in human dna connected to revelation 16:13-14 and 2nd Corinthians 11:13-15 are way too complex in too many outlets and derivatives which apply to life in general.
What I just addressed in writing? It is irrefutably logical . The information I just addressed there in writing. I’m quite certain .
Look closely at the facts I just addressed and wrote down.
That’s an obvious foregone conclusion.
Factually speaking.
Pure and simple
No comments:
Post a Comment