I have shared '02 Track 2TRY-YEEEE-HAAA!.wma' with you on Box.
THREE OBVIOUSLY INNOCENT LADIES OF AMERICA.
Praise this innocent lady for what she has suffered through.
I mean "what the hell!!!
No. Government officials involved in this case aren't deceptive?
https://youtu.be/4iinlNR7SWk
They claim they have no evidence of someone coming into the house.
Well?
Listen.
All the evidence points to the fact that these murders were planned by someone else.
So?
Doesnt logic dictate that " the murderer would be careful not to leave a trace of himself in the house then?
Clearly shes innocent.
You morons.
Holy jesus.
The cops in this case are evil bastards
and bitches.
Jesus sees what these cops did.
Evil bastards.
The intruder could have easily used some other blade to cut the screen outside.
And then grabbed a knife from inside to kill the boys.
I feel theirs evidence here to surmise that corrupt people wanted to set darlie up for this.
Maybe even a scorned government official who was jealous that darlie refused his advances.
Because saying darlie did this is plain nuts.
Look closely at the facts.
.and look closely at her expressions.
Shes not hiding anything.
Look closely.
That's for sure.
Her eyes are totally sad.
That's CLEARLY CLEARLY not the face of a diabolical killer.
Or nutjob.
That's totally obvious.
If their was blood on darlies shirt it is quite possible that she had been trying to protect her children while someone was attacking them.
And she didnt recall that fully because of the dramatic event which had just unfolded in her house.
And their blood splattered on to the back of her shirt.
That way.
Or... it's possible the murderer was smart if he was looking to frame dolly and splattered that blood on the back of her shirt.
Or she fell onto her back into their blood at some point.
I mean this is a pretty dramatic event.
She might have over looked that.
Due to that.
That wouldnt be surprising in a situation this nuts.
As darlie was groggy and nearly killed.
A woman like that it appears to me isnt able to stab herself in the neck.
Like that.
Anybody who says different is lying.
That's more believable then anything these cops are saying .
Here.
Also theirs no solid evidence darlie went outside to cut the screen door.
No solid evidence.
At all.
And
Investigators of this crime aactually also tried to say that it takes a specific type of butcher knife to cut a screen door?
What?
Who are these people?
Who said that?
Any type of butcher knife will cut a screen .In any way at all.
Easily.
You imbeciles.
It depends on how old and worn out the screen is , at times,, and
So?
That argument in itself proves these investigators are picking at straws in trying to frame darlie for this crime.
So?
summary on that count?
Their is absolutely no real evidence at all that darlie went outside to cut the screen door.
AT ALL.
That's all here say or theories these cops have CORRUPTLY made up.
Clearly what I just said there is entirely correct.
And shes always professed her innocence.
Shes never done anything else.
Theirs no real flaw in her story.
And shes never altered her story.
Perhaps " their were minor inconsistencies in her relation to the events that had unfolded all around her that night.
AS THE SITUATION THAT OCURRED THST NIGHT AS OPPOSED TO A DIRECT LIE!
π±
When people are that steadfast?
It's almost always a sign that their telling the truth.
Their was a study done on that.
And that was the result of the study.
When someone doesnt alter their story?
Ever?
π€·♀️ππ€·♂️ππ€·♀️That means their telling the truth...π€·♂️ππ€·♀️ππ€Ή♀️
It appears to me these cops set her up for a fall.
I really believe that.
What assholes.
The american statute that says
INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IS A CROCK OF SHIT STSTUTE.
HERE.
SET DARLIE FREE.
SHES CLEARLY NOT GUILTY.
YOU ATROCIOUS LAW ENFORCERS
WHO DID THIS TO AN INNOCENT LADY.
WHO SUFFFERED LIKE THAT?
ALL I CAN SAY IS " WHAT ASSHOLES THOSE COPS ARE.
SORRY.
YET CALL A SPADE A SPADE.
THEIRS CLEARLY NO REAL EVIDENCE SHE KILLED HER SONS.
OBVIOUSLY THEIRS NOT.
SO SET HER FREE.
AND GIVE HER TWO MILLION DOLLARS COMPENSATION.
ONE MILLION FOR EACHSON SHE LOSST...
BY high COPS.
TOO.
NO LESS.
WHAT AN INJUSTICE.
THATS ALL THIS IS.
THEY WORKED HARD TO PIN THIS LIE ON HER.
PERIOD.
P.s.
And I'm pretty sure " she has no criminal record.
Too.
Darren seems more guilty.
Here.
by far.
Saying the weird things he said.
When the police arrived.
Very weird comments indeed.
Because" for what happened?
.to say what darren said?
That too makes no sense.
It sounds to me like theirs a possibility darren hired someone to come in and do this to darlie.
And kill his two sons.
That's weird.
Wtf.
Man.
His response when the police arrived is absurd..
That's idiotic.
What he said.
Calmly saying that?
Sure.
Okay.
How much did the police investigate darren?
In this case?
I'm just wondering.
BECAUSE WHAT I JUST WROTE?
IT BASICALLY PROVES DARLIES NOT GUILTY OF THIS.
AND SHE WASNT SUICIDAL EITHER.
USUALLY
PEOPLE WHO ARE NON VIOLENT LAW ABIDING CITIZENS LIKE DARLIE ALL THEIR LIFE DONT DO THIS.
Also the prosecution in this case said " it appeared that a finger print found in blood belonged to either Devon
or damon.
So?
What does that prove?
In no way at all does that prove darlie killed Devon or damon.
Not only that though.
In that matter ?
Of a so called finger print ?
Found in blood?
At the scene of this crime?
The prosecution in this case said " it appeared that the finger print belonged to devon or damon.
First off, it's common knowledge that two people dont usually have the same finger prints.
On earth.
Even if their twins.
That's a fact.
So why did the prosecution in this case say that "it appears that either devon or Damon's finger print was found in blood.?
At the crime?
Furthermore the prosecution used the word " appeared" to describe that situation.
Now to use the word " appeared ?
To describe that finger print?
It's π€·♀️obviousππ€·♂️ their trying to make darlie look guilty.
If you have to try to make darlie look guilty in this then that too is a sign that shes not guilty.
Innocent until proven guilty is an american court motto.
A motto though that clearly isnt followed here.
In this case.
LOOK AT THE FACTS.
RELEASE THIS LADY AND SET HER FREE.
FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE.
TO NOT DO THAT?
THATS A MAJOR INJUSTICE.
EVERYTHING I JUST WROTE HERE?
PROVES THAT STATEMENT CORRECT.
π±FACTUALLY
π!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!π²
This was a complete set up.. wow.
Now I'm wondering who these texas cops really are?
They say the luminol revealed imprints of darlies feet by the sink.
At the beginning of this video a lady mentions the fact that government officials were talking to darren. Or darlie.
Either way, a lady mentions government officials were talking to them before this crime took place.
Listen.
This was a complete set up.
I've proven that through the facts addressed in this post already.
Do I really have to clarify this obvious matter too..?
Okay.
I will.
Here goes.
The intruder wiped the blood away in some places where darlie had stepped with her feet' obviously" to make darlie look guilty when they checked for footprints with luminol.
And he was careful to make sure he did not step in the blood.
He was also using shoe footing that would leave no evidence of imprints.
Why?
Obviously
Because he knew the police would find darlies feet imprints in the luminol.
Obviously.
Also note this.
Investigators claim a single fibre glass fragment on a knife from the routier kitchen indicates darlie used the knife to stage the scene.
Yet " what does that literally prove?
Why do I say that people?
That fibre could have easily been accidentally transferred to' or planted onto that knife in an effort to make darlie look guilty.
All the facts"" "in their entirety'""" verify that their IS no real solid evidence to condemn darlie.
In this case.
Good grief.
That's obvious.
Summarize facts properly.
Is everyone involved in this case crazy?
When? Why?
Who?
How?
Dumb investigators of this crime.
π€Ή♀️π€Ή♀️ππ§♂️⛅πππππππ€½♀️π€πππΉπ¦§πππ⛅π§♂️π§♂️π€Ή♀️πππ΄♂️π☄π⚡π±π²πππππ§♂️πΉ☄πππΉπ§♂️☄☄ππͺππ€π☄☄ππ²πππππΉπ¦§π¦§π²πdarlie being guilty of this is about as unlikely as randy johnson hitting a bird with a baseball in pro baseball.
And just because Randy Johnson did actually hit a bird with a baseball
π€©πππ€ͺππ€Ή♀️π πππ¦§ππ€☃️πππ²π¦§πΉππͺππ§♂️ππ±⚡
Listen to the 911 call
Listen closely.
She never changed her story..
Shes clearly frantic.
Theirs no insincerity at all.
The woman is clearly innocent.
Her husband however.?
The more I analse the facts of this case?
The more peculiar he sounds.
That's for sure.
He was affiliated with a variety of government agencies.
I think he had grown tired of darlie
And he didnt want to give her half his money.
In a divorce settlement.
I believe that's the only thing here that makes sense.
So he hired someone to do this.
How much did the police investigate him?
Probably no proper investigation there.
Listen to darlie
In the 911 call.
That's not the voice of a murderer.
Clearly it's not.
And anyone who says differently?
Their selling something.
Call a spade a spade.
Pure and simple.
πππΈππͺπ☄π₯πͺπ π€·♀️π°π§♂️ππ£π€ͺπ΄♂️π€·♂️π€Ή♀️
I heard a prosecutor on tv " shortly after the murders say
"too
Thaat darlie must be guilty of this crime because she celebrated one of her dead children's birthdays shortly after the murders.
Too.
At the child's grave site.
REALLY?
IS THAT THE BEST THAT PROSECUTOR HAS GOT?
REGARDING HIS CONDEMNATION OF DARLIE?
INTHIS CRIME.
WOW.
OF COURSE.
OF course a mother who LOVINGLY celebrates her dead child's birthday is evil.
Right.
Mr prosecutor?
Your an idiot prosecutor for saying that.
π§♀️ππ₯π§♂️π π±π♂️π♂️π±π π§♂️π₯ππ§♀️π€Ή♀️π€·♂️π΄♂️π€ͺπ£ππ§♂️π°π€·♀️π πͺπ₯☄ππͺππΈππ♂️π±π π§♂️π₯π
Ooo
And
ππππ⚡π²ππ¦§πππ€ͺππ€Ή♀️π ππΉπΉπ⚡πΉππ€ππ΄♂️π¦§π¦§⚡π±π²πΉπππ€©π€©πππ€ͺππ€Ή♀️π π΄♂️πͺππ€Ή♀️π π☃️πͺπ€ππ€Ή♀️πΉπΉπ⛅☄ππ²π€ͺππ±ππππ⚡ππ€©
A doctor charles lynch mentions he found something from the cut screen on the knife.
And then he talks in circles" sort of' skeptically" about how fibres shouldnt be some place.
Really?
Ooo?
What really does that prove?
What does that prove regarding darlie being guilty?
It's clear this is a set up.
They framed darlie.
Because their corrupt.
So obviously they'd talk about all sorts of scientific forensics on that note.
To make themselves look wise.
When all these cops truly are " are obvious perjurors and murderers.
I,Ve presented enough evidence to confirm darlie is clearly innocent of this crime.
And at the very least ' she should be exonerated.
You dont condemn a person to death or condemn a person to even life in prison when this many facts verify this lady is most likely innocent of this crime.
Theirs clearly not enough evidence to convict her.
American law says "" innocent until proven guilty.
Yet that's not something these corrupt cops care about.
Obviously it's not something these cops care about.
That " in itself" is a sign these cops dont give a hoot about justice.
What these cops wanted was to see darlies naked body abused in prison.
They wanted to see darlies Hooters.
in Prison.
These cops didnt give a hoot about the law though.
Here.
In summary that's obvious.
That's whats happening here.
Maybe one of them was obsessed with darlie.
So they set her up.
For a horrible fall.
Either way
I've presented enough facts here which clearly " at the very least" imply"that this is a set up.
Its irrefutably a set up.
That's why I'm wondering who these cops really are.
They are police nightmares.
As
I believe my facts prove darlies innocent here.
I'm presenting facts here.
You realize.
But just for the record" I'll use the word " imply," because this is completely absurd.
Ya know what ?
These cops are worse in corruption then the blundering corrupt cops who investigated the famous KEDDIE CABIN MURDERS .
INCREDIBLE.
I MEAN THESE TEXAS COPS ARE CLEARLY LYING.
LOOK AT THE FACTS IVE PRESENTED HERE ON THIS CASE.
I CLEARLY PROVE THROUGH FACTS THAT DARLIE IS INNOCENT.
I TELL YOU WHAT?
I DARE EVEN ONE OF THESE COPS TO STAB THEMSELVES WITH A BUTCHER KNIFE IN THE NECK TO THE POINT WHERE THEY ALMOST DIE...
OF CORSE.
OF COURSE.
THATS WHAT NON VIOLENT LADIES WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD DO ALL THE TIME.
And something else I'd like to state at this moment is this.
If darlie actually did brutally psychotically stab herselfπ€ͺ in the neck and then " after that calmlyπ€·♀️ stab herself in the arm brutally too like a deranged lunatic
then why in the world didnt the police and american courts deem her insane?
Isnt that what an insane person would do?
Have you listened to darlie?
Have you looked in her eyes?
Shes clearly not insane at all.
And summarized" truthfully?
It's quite obvious
Shes clearly incapable of doing that to herself .
People?
Theres no solid evidence either that she did commit this atrocious crime.
Obviously theirs no evidence shes truly guilty.
Is everyone who is evaluating this case completely stupid?
Except me?
And as for the cops who are accusingdarlie of this I'll now say this.
Too.
ARE ThESE COPS LISTENING TO THEMSELVES?
HERE?
SHE ALMOST DIED.
FROM THE WOUND TO HER NECK.
THATS ABSURD TO SAY SHE DID THAT TO HERSELF.
That's why I'm writing this.
THIS WAS CLEARLY A SET UP.
TO FRAME DARLIE.
IVE JUST PROVEN THAT THROUGH FACTS.
How this many texas police officers are working here
To make an innocent lady look guilty is pretty nuts.
OF A TRUTH.. YOU KNOW WHAT?
IM GONNA TELL YOU SOMETHING RIGHT NOW.
These texas cops show everyone what jesus was really talking about in matthew 17 connected to ISIAH 5: 20 and Jeremiah 17: 5 of CHRISTIANITYS scriptures.
Now.
Dont they?
Wow.
Anyhow.
The bottom line is " what I'm saying here iS basically this.
Irrefutably all my facts which relate to this crime "which I address on this crime " in summary" moreover CLEaRLY imply THAT DARLIE IS INNOCENT OF THIS CRIME SHE IS ACCUSED OF.
AND THE EVIdENCE HERE ALSO CLEARLY IMPLIES THE REAL INTRUDER WHO COMMITTED THE CRIME WAS FULLY AWARE OF POLICE PROCEDURES.
SO I SUSPECT A HIGHER UP IN AUTHORITY LIKE A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMMITTED THIS CRIME.
OR
that a corrupt police officer WAS THE intruder.
THE FACTS OF THIS CASE " IN SUMMARY" OBVIOUSLY VERIFY THAT
This was a set up.
Against darlie.
Which reflects this.
Pure and simple.
Also how did darren not hear anything?
He was in another part of the house.
When it happened.
Right?
Seems to me on that note he'd hear a commotion like that.
Okay. I just came accross a video on this case which says darren claims he did hear darlie screaming for help.
Okay.
If that's the case " whydidnt he get to darlie in time to at least help her a little bit?
The only thing thatmakes sense is that this was planned.
And someone was working with darren in this.
Crazy as that may sound.
Because the killer knew whendarlie waas downstairs.
Alone with the kids.
Why didnt darren come rushing when he heard the ruckus?
He wasnt tied up.
Or anything.
Right?
Maybe hes innocent.
But I doubt it.
He didnt get there in time to help at all.
But Darren insists there was an intruder.
That too is weird.
All facts verify their was an intruder and darlie didnt kill her kids.
That's obvious.
When the facts are summarized properly.
But why didnt darren get there in time to see an intruder?
That's the question.
That doesn't make sense.
On Darren's part.
also their is the fact darren had a lot of money to pay somebody to do this and then keep shut about it.
Murderers have done that in the past.
You know.?
That's not unheard of.
And also it should also be clarified that
Darren made some strange comments.
Shortly after the murders. To authorities he didnt seem to weird in saying it.
I guess.
But he did casually say " I can understand why someone would want to come in and have sex with darlie.
And then Darren hinted that maybe the kids got in the way..
The point though?
To why I bring that up?
He said it too casually.
Not exactly sorrowful.
Not exactly angry.π
Not exactly panic stricken.
Not exhibiting rage that his wife was almost killed by a knife to the throat.
And most importantly?
Daren showed no real anger at the fact two of his children were just killed.
He spoke too casually.
And calmly.
In saying those things.
After such a horrific event wouldnt a husband and father show some kind of stress?
Or anger?
Somethings amiss.
There?
On that note?
I basically prove " with facts" that darlie is innocent of committing this crime.
Here.
https://easytruelove.blogspot.com/2019/05/hermaphroditusc2q45-tuesday-april-12_92.html
And literally speaking only someone with the brain intellect of an ostrich could not see I'm right.
Regarding darlies innocence.
When reading my facts.
I list in that link..
Above.
Now I'm going to say something to youtube.
Regarding rational comments I have left on the video of darlies case.
Which they have deleted.
Attached to that comment section of that video.
I'm placing this comment there now too.
Attaching this comment to this journal.
If youtube authorities aren't in on corruption?
They'll allow my obvious truths to be heard.
By not corruptly deleting this comment.
Why do officials magistating this case smell spiritually satanic?
If they delete this comment?
Come the christian day of judgment?
Connected to luke 12: 1 to 3?
Of christianity?
I'm gonna annihilate
and TORTURE whoever hypocritically deletes this comment.
Because what I write here?
Its truth.
True love does not hypocritically love obvious hypocritical evil on that note.
obviously.
American officials have " for no real justifiable reason" clearly tortured an innocent womanπ€ͺ in many unneccacary ways the past 20 or so years for a crime she clearly did not commit.
Let the truth be known..
And set this poor woman free.
YouTube authorities?
Dont be stupid here.
I mean what i just said.
Period.
SING IT LOUD! THE REAL TRUTH
SPOKEN IN THIS CASE AT LAST.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
PANTHEISTICAL PARADOXICAL PANORAMIC PARRALEL PARAGON
http://youtu.be/o4pA0ytVXZk
is psalm 50: 22 connected to THE HOLY SPIRITS INSTRUCTIONS SPOKEN THROUGH JESUS CHRIST IN MATTHEW 24: 51 RIGHTEOUS UPON HYPOCRITES?
http://youtu.be/EKA1CXBOchY
WHAT DO THE FACTS STATE?
WHAT DOES A HUMAN DICTIONARY SAY THE REAL MEANING TO THE WORD 'FACT' IS?
WHAT HAVE EARTHS INHABITANTS DONE TO GODS LAWS AS WELL AS TO MOTHER EARTH IN THIS LIFE?
FOR NO RIGHTEOUS REASON HUMANS HAVE SHIT ON GODS LAWS FOR THE MAJORITY IN THIS LIFE. WHEN THEIR WAS NO RIGHTEOUS REASON TO DO SO.
CLEAR AND SIMPLE.
http://youtu.be/F1dmDxbv01c
http://youtu.be/4o7UXMbUAWs
http://youtu.be/6N7zaQu2bXs
http://youtu.be/_yYeoQVREw0 mu
Followers
rmaphroditusc2q45
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
catholic prista's minister in spiritual 'drag.
Darren made some strange comments. Shortly after the murders. To authorities he didnt seem to weird in saying it.
I guess.
But he did casually say " I can understand why someone would want to come in and have sex with darlie.
And then Darren hinted that maybe the kids got in the way..
The point though?
To why I bring that up?
He said it too casually.
Not exactly sorrowful.
Not exactly angry.
Not exactly panic stricken.
Not exhibiting rage that his wife was almost killed by a knife to the throat.
And most importantly?
Daren showed no real anger at the fact two of his children were just killed.
He spoke too casually.
And calmly.
In saying those things.
After such a horrific event wouldnt a husband and father show some kind of stress?
Or anger?
Somethings amiss.
There?
On that note?
I basically prove " with facts" that darlie is innocent of committing this crime.
Here. Too. in this link.
A quarter of the way through.
https://easytruelove.blogspot.com/2022/01/the-computer-wont-let-me-publish-this.html
https://easytruelove.blogspot.com/2019/05/hermaphroditusc2q45-tuesday-april-12_92.html
As well as in the very first post of this blog website.
EASYTRUELOVE.BLOGSPOT.COM
And here too..
EVISEYDD.BLOGSPOT.COM
And literally speaking only someone with the brain intellect of an ostrich could not see I'm right.
Regarding darlies innocence.
When reading my facts.
I list in that link..
Above.
If youtube authorities aren't in on corruption?
They'll allow my obvious truths to be heard.
By not corrupting deleting this comment.
If they delete this comment?
Come the christian day of judgment?
Connected to luke 12: 1 to 3?
Of christianity?
I'm gonna annihilate and TORTURE whoever hypocritically deletes this comment.
Because what I write here?
Its truth.
American officials have " for no real justifiable reason" clearly tortured an innocent women in many unneccacary ways the past 20 or so years for a crime she clearly did not commit.
Let the truth be known..
And set this poor women free.
YouTube authorities?
Dont be stupid here.
I mean what i just said.
Period.
Investigators claim a single fibre glass fragment on a knife from the routier kitchen indicates darlie used the knife to stage the scene.
ReplyDeleteYet " what does that literally prove?
Why do I say that people?
That fibre could have easily been accidentally transferred to' or planted onto that knife in an effort to make darlie look guilty.