Analysing criminal behaviour. Gooooood. Gooood.

To the readers of this website.note this.

 The following website" with the assistance of images and videos " serves as an assistant website to my prime website attached here   

ESOTERICSPIRITS.BLOGSPOT.COM 

In 

 summarizing the relevant

 facts as well as figures of this existence properly for all created beings just prior to a 

retrograde spoken of by nostradamus in C4Q97 of that prophet of christs prophesies  set to occur for humans in this life soon.

A precursor introduction to this website is now forwarded ASFOLLOWS.

Before I begin the regular  introductions to this site.

Which applies to a lady who was recently the victim of a crime in the united states of america.

The name of the  lady is jessica chambers.

And a video to such a case is listed below.

https://youtu.be/suMZeFI6CwA

For the record 

This is a sad case. And it makes me wonder if it's worth it to pay countries with  gasoline money to operate cars.

On that note" I'll say this. Im a Canadian resident. And  Recently travelled by bus to toronto canada.
About 4 years back.
On a social visit actually to a friend.
Can anyone reading this message tell me what one of the first major signs was " that I saw" in big orange letters?

Upon entering the city of toronto at that time?

The sign said this.
"" PLEASE HELP US CONSERVE THE ENVIRONMENT AND SAVE MOTHER EARTH BY   TAKING  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION .

I FIND IT SO INTERESTING  ON THAT NOTE THAT "EVERYONE IS AWARE THAT MOTHER EARTH IS IN AGONY AT THIS POINT IN THIS EXISTENCE.

DUE TO THE FACT HUMANS PLACE GASOLINE BEFORE THE WELFARE OF MOTHER EARTH.

NO ONE ON EARTH  TRULY DOES ANYTHING RATIONAL IN SUCH A REGARD" IN THAT WHICH RELATES TO THE SALVATION OF MOTHER EARTH.
EVER. THOUGH. DESPITE THAT OBVIOUS TRUTH.

REGARDING EVERYONE ON EARTH" FOR THE MAJORITY" BEING AWARE OF THAT TRUTH.

AS FAR AS I CAN SEE.

EVERYONE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT GASOLINE OPERATED CARS MERCILESSLY KILLS MOTHER EARTH.
EVERY DAY.

AND ALSO FOR CLARITY --- RUNNING GAS OPERATED CARS "" BOTH  WAS AND  IS ""  NEVER TRULY A NECESSITY FOR HUMANS  IN SURVIVING ON EARTH.

HUMANS ONLY APPROACH GAS RUN INVENTIONS BECAUSE HUMANS CLEARLY DO NOT TRULY CARE THAT MOTHER EARTH SUFFERS IN AGONY EVERY SINGLE DAY THIS EXISTENCE CONTINUES.

AND EARTHS INHABITANTS TODAY SHOW NO SIGNS OF CARING THAT LATER GENERATIONS AND HUMAN CHILDREN MAY NOT EVEN BE ABLE TO BREATH EARTHS ATMOSPHERE.

SOON...

BECAUSE OF SUCH CALLOUS MODERN DAY TRANSPORT INVENTIONS ON ESRTH PRSENTLY IN FACT...

AND THATS DESPITE THE FACT HUMANS KNOW ABOUT GO GREE  SOLAR POWERED CARS TOO.

WHILE MOTHER EARTH IS MURDERED EVERY DAY.
AGAIN AND AGAIN.

THROUGH THE OPERATION OF GAS PROPELLED INVENTIONS.
BY ALL OF EARTHS PRESENT INHABITANTS.

FOR THE MAJORITY.
THESE   ARE TRUE CRIME CHANNELS.

ON THAT NOTE..
RIGHT?

REGARDING THE VIDEOS PRESENTLY ATTACHED HERE TO THIS POST.

WELL?
I'D SAY ALL OF EARTHS INHABITANTS COMMITTING MURDER  BY KILLING MOTHER EARTH EVERY DAY " THROUGH MODERN TRANSPORT INVENTIONS IS PRETTY MUCH CRIMINAL.
RIGHT?
YES.
EXACTLY.

COULD THIS IMBECILE IN THIS VIDEO HAVE MURDERED JESSICA CHAMBERS IN SUCH A CRAZY WAY IF JESSICAS NATION " THE UNITED STATES " DID WHAT IS RIGHT?
IN THIS REGARD?

BY CUTTING TIES WITH CORRRUPT BUISNESSES AND COMPANIES ON EARTH  WHO  SELL OIL AND
GASOLINE ?

TO RUN CARS?

NO.

THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS " NO.

THIS INDIVIDUAL COULD NOT HAVE MURDERED JESSICA CHAMBERS IN THIS RIDICULOUS WAY IF THE KILLER IN THIS VIDEO DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO GASOLINE.

JESSICA CHAMBERS WOULD PROBABLY BE OKAY.
TOO.

AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

IN THIS EXISTENCE.

IF GAS RUN CARS DIDNT EXIST IN THE USA.

SO?
WTF?
WHAT A SURPRISE.

EH?

ON THAT NOTE.

HEY.
CALL A SPADE A SPADE.
EVIL PEOPLE THRIVE WHERE GASOLINE IS.

THEY ALWAYS HAVE.

And they always will.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE FACTS OF HUMAN HISTORY CLOSELY.
IN THIS MATTER.

ESPECIALLY REGARDING HOW GASOLINE IGNITES  FIRE USUALLY INTENSELY.

Foolish humans should never place with fire like that.

That's too dangerous.

By way of hebrews 12: 28 to 29 and Roman's6: 1 to 3 of christianity.

AS GODS HOLY FIRES ARE USUALLY HOTTEST.

HEY.

IM JUST SAYING.

REVELATION 16: 13 TO 14 AND 1ST COR 10: 20_ 21 ARE WRITTEN AS WARNINGS FOR HUMANS REGARDING DEVILISH MODERN TRANSPORT INVENTIONS ON PLANET EARTH FOR RATIONAL REASONS IN THIS LIFE.

JUST SO PEOPLE TODAY ARE AWARE.

 

IM JUST CLARIFYING A TRUTH.
JUST SO PEOPLE ARE AWARE.

AND ON THAT NOTE TO PROCEED IN CLOSING THIS COMMENT I SHALL NOW STATE THE FOLLOWING.
HERES A QUESTION MORTALS MIGHT BE INTRIGUED BY.

LISTEN CLOSELY NOW. TO THIS.
JUST FOR THE APPROPRIATE SAKE OF RECORD NOTE THIS NOW.

If one was required to find a physical way to weigh a section of fire in """ ooo say... a fire place burning and crackling on earth someplace"HERE ON THIS PLANET in particular, how could this be accomplished?

Physically speaking I mean.
In mortal terms?

There is a rational answer to this question.
If a humans thinks about this question properly...

The answer is simple to address.
One simply must suspend time.

Because
It's the passing of time " in regular terms" on earth" which gives earthly flames anyways powers to continue to burn .

On earth.
In this existence.
So it's obviously einstein's theories right?

That were talking about here.
Meaning?

One must master time travel in some capacity'" in order to " suspend or zoom through time.
In this existence.

To weigh fire specifically.
Connected to luke 1: 37 obviously.
Meaning?

Once you freeze the flames or the section of burning fire" then the fire is weighable.
Correct?

Of course.

The fire no longer is crackling and continually changing weight through its incinerating nearly  everything physical it comes into contact with likewise.

When fire is burning in this life.

Obviously that means " if a section of fire is constantly burning in this terrestrial existence then fire cannot be weighed.

Because it's always changing in weight.
If you freeze the flames though " through a suspension in time regarding  the set universal molecular functions of GODS  space time continumm in this life" then" fire becomes still and harmless for MORTALS

In this existence.

Then it can  be weighed in a balance.
Perfectly clear and perfectly simple.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6816707/amp/Jessica-Chambers-boyfriend-shot-killed-five-years-burned-death.html&ved=2ahUKEwjs4ICch7r1AhXBKM0KHb5pBO8QFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3BdZMKEIgy2pz4M1QJJoTV

I now conclude this post with this information.

With this.

Watch "When A Karen Goes To Prison.." on YouTube

https://youtu.be/KC7m4RSOFsg 

They locked eyes " and turned into demons albeit in human form. Very shocking. I dont know. What does saint paul mean in 2and CORINTHIANS 11: 13 to 15?

And what in the name of all that is truly holy does jesus mean when jesus says that hes come only for the jews? On earth?

 Connected to matthew 10: 6 and matthew 15: 24. For example. Woe? Does that mean jesus christ is diabolically racist?

Perhaps jesus is actually a racist.

As Roman's 2: 9 to 10 and malachi 3: 6 warn every mortal on earth.

I dont know?

Perhaps.

I quess that means he is.

Dont go crazy about it..

though.

In connection to this?

Roman's 9: 13 and zechariah 12: 7.

Ooo and this too.

Toospirituallytrue.blogspot.com 

. right?

RIGHT.

And this.

https://youtu.be/kNkA9BRRwpY 

You wonder if magdalene danced around the cave and  chanted at all during these psychotically maniacal  crazed rituals?.
Ya know?

I find it hard to fathom how people would think she had begun believing she was an Inca goddess.

But it seems that" if I'm recalling this correctly" it seems to me that the writer of the BUFFY the VAMPIRE series " did an off shoot" shall I say?

To this real crime drama.

In an episode of buffy.
Entitled Inca princess.
Only difference between the two?

Magdelena wasnt really an inca mummy goddess.
In the BUFFY episode

The princess literally is a resurrected  mummy zombie that drinks human blood to stay young.
If I'm recalling the date correctly?

I think that episode is located in season two of buffy.
Just for the sake of appropriate record.

Ooo one last notion to mention to this topic.
A Mexican lady by the name of sarah aldrete became a serial killer in mexico in a cult that sort of also resembled the functions of this psychotic case on youtube.

Do check it out some time if this sort of lunacy strikes your fancy.
HMMNNN?.

Very strange world we live in..
Yes.
Very.
Quick trivia question on that note?
What criminal lady in history as the lady with more direct human kills then any other lady in the history of the human race?
Who knows the answer?

Give up?
Okay.
I'll just say it.

Maria Mandel. Half a million humans died at her hands in WW2 nazi germany.

Far more then even ilsa koch and irme griese.
Strange that griese and koch are so much more well known therefore.

Interesting eh?

Watch "She Vanished For 2 Days & Then They Discovered Something Disturbing: 5 Strangest Cold Cases" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/bpKzmcUBhFk https://youtu.be/bpKzmcUBhFk

To the readers of this website.

Now a few brief notes on this true crime video on youtube.

Worded as follows.

To the reader.

They found the car.

Right?

 were finger prints found?

I suppose the fire did not allow it.

But a check up still should have been done.

Even in that which pertains to dna.

Todays police forces should check the burnt car.

For dna.

If the car is still around.

But,  it was  also  a time when security cameras were not around as much.

Hmmnn?

I sense I know the answer to the killers identity.

Or how to find out who he is.

But how?

Hmmnn?

Ih huh.

How about this.

I sense that the killer was a member of her church and worked at the hospital simultaneously.

And lived in a location where he could see her driving her car usually.

I'm fairly sure the spirit world is telling me that.

I believe he knew dorothy and her parents.

Summary? from what I caught

I suspect what someone else suspects.

In these comments.

Below.

The killer knew the father.

Well.

And didnt  like the father.

But was afraid of the father.

Yet the killer did not know the mother well.

At all.

These things I'm saying here?

Seem rational.

No detective ever evaluated these ideas I'm giving?

On this case?

Hmmnn?

Was there a recording of the voice?

Very strange that the murderer called that many times yet a recording was never made of even one phone call.

So, how do we solve this?

Someone at the hospital knows who the killer is. Someone saw something. Weird occur.

The killer was watching her.

And someone saw the killer being weird.

In stalking dorothy.

I'm positive of it.

Theirs a witness at the hospital.

Or was a witness there.

When dorothy went to get her car.

Who never came forward with that information...

Detectives should have interviewed people.

At the hospital.

If detectives can?

They need to check to see if any cameras were near Dorothy's car.

At the hospital when she went for her car that day.

Did they do that?

It doesnt appear like they did.

Hmmnn?

My assumption.  And it's only an assumption.. I believe " if a detective" evaluates dorothy's church .

And does detective work there?

I believe the killer will be located.

There.

Someone who both went to Dorothy's church and had minor access to the hospital.

I'm pretty sure that's correct.

A detective or the police  need to do some investigating in those areas  to find out who was at dorothy's church who might know the father well.

Too.

What's wrong with these detectives and police who handled Dorothy's case?

All they had to do was that.

And any suspects they found suspicious?

Simply let the mother listen to his voice.

That's how any rational detective would have solved this case.

It's possible the mother just wasnt good at determining voices over a phone.

Too.

If she did know the killer by face.

Yet it moreover appears the mother did not know the killer.

Or if she knew him" it was barely.

From dorothy's church.

Or perhaps the neighborhood.

Or

The man also could be someone who could clearly see dorothy come and go " from work.

Possibly a co worker? Or some one who ultimately  worked or lived close to her work.

Because he knew she was at the hospital.

The day she tried to  take  her co worker home from the hospital.

How did the murderer know she was at the hospital?

Unless he was a co worker?

Or he was someone who lived or worked near her work.

Whether the man is alive still? Or not.

Those are just hunches.

The stronger hunch?

Someone who could see her come and go from work.

Someone she briefly met.

Who was also monitoring dorothy from church.

Too.

Because she was certain she knew his voice.

Didnt any witnesses see anything?

There must have been  a witness somewhere.

At the hospital.

When the idiot drove by.

So.  ..... yeah.

That should be a place to start too.

I'm fairly positive detectives should have interviewed as many hospital staff as possible in this case...

Someone at the hospital saw something.

They saw him in the parking garage or wherever Dorothy's car was, acting suspicious.

Someone at the hospital is with holding information in this case.

Tell a detective to get to the hospital to ask what staff was on duty.

At that time.

As well as around the hospital.

Was anyone around the hospital.

At that time?

Or someone 

Who was lurking near her car.

Right?

Someone saw the guy.

Clearly.

So,

Begin looking for witnesses there.

I hope the police had the common sense to do that.

At least.

But, it appears that's not what the cops did.

Why the hell didnt the cops ' handling this case, do that?

Hmmnn?

Bad police and detective work.

In this case.

That's basically police negligence.

Pure and simple.

And in the other case?

Here? in the case of specifically LAURA? The last victim?

For the sake of record,

The reference to the person who had a different rug in his quarters " right after laura was found murdered and rolled up in a rug sounds pretty legit " to me.""

🤨Are you telling me the New York homicide division did not thoroufhly investigate that lead?😲

It sure sounds like the narrator of the video is implying that's what happened.

Let me tell  you.

☄if New York police did not investigate that lead in detail"   then  fire the entire  homicide division,

Associated with the investigation.🐰🐒

Their monkey cops.

Pure and simple.

😲🤪🦧

Well .  It's too late now.

To fire those cops.

But they should have been fired.

And something else.

New York has a lot of people.

You know?

Someone saw something.

So?

Come forward.

Give the parents a bit of peace.

Good grief.

Finally, in the case of Linda Sherman?

Was the husband given a lie  de tecter test?

I'm pretty sure, he killed Linda.. 

It's just too suspicious.

The daughter said her mother wasnt moving.

On the couch?before her dad took her to school.?

Something he never did?

But rather linda did?

Always?

Sure.

Sure.

And then this responsible mother just high tails it !?

And leaves her daughter?

Right.

Sure.

Hmmn?

Ya know?

Not giving buddy a lie detector test?

That " too" is technically criminal negligence on the part of american cops.

In that case.

Too.

Police in america are dumb.

Sometimes.

I now close this post with this.

With

A comment attached to this video.

Located below.

Worded as follows.

https://youtu.be/KJU-bkDcncY 

I,ve known so many hypocritical people, who have gone to church, by day, and boasted that they weren't into sex, and then ' years later , found out , they were fornicating demons into all sorts of esx, that, it kind of blows my mind.

That's why, I always wonder when I hear narrators of videos like this, talking like their shocked at people that such people were guilty of certain misdemeanours in sex .

Or other crimes.

By taking that verbal.stance in videos , such narrators of these videos are clearing boasting that their not sinful.
Like the people their judging in these videos.

Such narrators who do this should
Keep what jesus says in  luke 12:1-3 of
Christianity
in mind .

Hey.
I'm just saying.
Dont wash the outside of your drinking cup only.
Wash the inside of the cup too.
Narrator.
Pure and simple.

When I was 17,  a friend of mine was drinking all night with other  friends.

At about 3 am the group of all night  revelers had reached wellington streets and high streets in london ontario.

One of them leaned over the bridge and fell into the river.

He had broken his leg and was swept away into the current by the thames river.

The group of revelers were too drunk to realize he was in trouble.

"" a few simply declared, """ Aw... hes okay!"" Gesturing towards him,with their hands.  Then the group started walking towards London's downtown core.

Leaving their comrade to swim for it, in the river.

With a broken leg.

The guy was found dead in the morning.

Should have called the police for help.

But they were too drunk.

How could around ten people be that drunk?

That they didnt call the police?

In a situation like that?

But that's what they did.

.studying various facets of human history. 

Summarizing the facts.

https://youtu.be/dzAWorRbWFY 

What a lunatic.🤡

I mean, charles manson was basically a guy who moved people's furniture around for kicks.

And

Its true that he mastered a plan to kill the libiancas and sharon tate.

But chucky didnt actually do the killings.

In fact, incredibly ,if one looks hard enough in human history, you can find pictures of Charles manson actually celebrating at hollywood parties with celebrities too.

Like original members of the beach boys actually.

My point?

If you compare the real crimes of charles manson with this "" Dayton fella"""?

Come on?

Dayton's way worse of a psychopath.

With more absurd murders committed by far.

So?

Why have I never heard of this person?

Whereas charles manson is a household name everywhere.

Even the son of Sam's crimes are almost a pleasant  walk in central park in New York city compared to Dayton.

Yet I've never of Dayton.

So?

It is a little strange.

I feel,I should add this, to this comment.

It appears to me that, in most cases it's obviously men who are the aggressors in rape cases.

I suppose I'll grant that, that is true.

For whatever reason.

Probably the weaker sex line is most fitting here..

So I wont dispute it here.

Yet, that said,I'll say this to close this comment.

Before I had reached the age of 18 years ,I had been sexually assaulted and the victim of attempted rapes by at least four adult women.

Now, I didnt report it.

It's TRUE.

Why?

Who knows.

Youth perhaps.

Albeit their are a lot of cases where female teaches also commit sexual assault on young boys in americas schools.

I wonder why so many cases exist where adult ladies only feel comfortable raping boys.

On that note.

And not men.

Once again,I suppose it's the weakest person syndrome.

A boy is an easy target for a female sex maniac  assailant.

Right?

Hmmn?

Strange.

My point though as to why I bring that subject up?

Men are not the aggressors all the time.

If you look closely on such a subject?

Female sex maniacs are everywhere.

Somehow though, it's just hidden from the public eye more.

It's that simple.