Rachel had proof that sarah had threatened her life many times.
That's clearly a fact.
In this case.
So?
When this homicide detective says the police cant do anything about a threat, what does that mean?
Here?
Arent death threats against someone illegal in that area of the United states?
On that note?
As sarah threatened rachel with death many times originally speaking.
In this case..
Sarah was the catalyst of that .
I mean, really?
Isnt that clear proof that the police are somewhat to blame?
In this case.
As sarah and her friends hounded rachel.
In this matter.
At many turns.
My question?
On that note?
Why didnt the police ever talk to sarah?
About that.
To tell sarah to stop threatening rachel.
Because the police didnt do that?
That tells me " theirs a self defence, defence case .
For rachel.
Here.
If one summarizes all the facts of this case properly.
Also, in the climax to this case?
Same situation.
Sarah drove to rachel . As usual. In this case.
And threatened rachel.
As usual.
Violently.
That's clearly what goes on her.
I'm pretty sure, this tape? Their showing? In this video? Of the girl? Threatening the other girl?
I'm not entirely certain. But I'm pretty certain, that's sarah threatening to kill rachel.
Not the other way around.
Why this video has that backwards?
Hmm?
I could be wrong..but I dont think so.
As i
saw another video on this case. That goes into the facts of the case.
In detail.
And that video said sarah threatened rachel with death.
That way...
Maybe maybe after sarah threatened rachel , rachel around and did the same.
Maybe?
But I dont think that's the case.
The downloader of this video should check that..
Anyways
The other video goes into more precise details of who was the aggressor here.
And, generally speaking?
, it was sarah.
By far who was DERANGED and the aggressor.
Not rachel.
Sarah was the one Who instigated the fighting. Between them.Mostly.
In this case.
Before rachel started to, I suppose stupidly carry a knife, for self defence purposes.
Against sarah and her clearly violent idiot friends.
Who were all hanging up on rachel.
.in this case.
That's why I feel the sentence handed to rachel was a little too harsh.
For the most part Rachel tried for quite a while to avoid fighting sarah and the girls.
Who were clearly being bullies to rachel.
Saran did most of the instigating and threats.
In this case.
At least that's what I recall the other videos facts of the case as stating.
Just for the record.
So?
In this video?
Their not exactly giving the full facts of this case.
Obviously.
But in conclusion?
Just for the record?
this guy?
They were fighting over?
He didnt help the situation.
At all.
He was just being an idiot.
He wanted them to fight.
And a man doesnt do that.
If he truly cares about decency..
You choose one woman
And you dont let young ladies kill each other.
Over you.
It's that simple.
So?
Hes a goof.
On that note.
Of a truth'
He didnt really care about either of them.
At all.
Not really.
Their were pawns in a game to him.
Obviously , on that note.
All the facts of this case verify that statement to be correct.
Completely.
So?
Therefore, on that note,
Both of these girls are technically at fault.
In this situation.
Right?
Yes.
Obviously
They should have realized that he obviously was enjoying watching them stupidly fight over him.
In cat fights.
Therefore, that means hes clearly nothing but a goof.
And
On that note they should have both
Dumped him.
And moved on.
Pure and simple.
But
Anyways,
I'm pretty sure that's what I recall.
In the other video.
Uh huh.
Yep.
I'm
Pretty sure that's what the other video said.
.
And it's probably correct.
Because this video goes out of it's way to actually say it might not have all the facts of the case present..here.
So?
On that note,
What's that?.
Now for case two of this post.
First off.
Here is a music link for all to enjoy.
https://app.box.com/s/8tax42y38wr7fta6ycxuxw4urq5yhq0z
To the readers: the music link presently attached to this website is attached in memory of the young boy directly related to this video.
Gannon staunch.
To the readers of this website.
Concerning this video?
Attached below?
Regarding a Colorado boys death?
Recently?
Blood found everywhere!!!
All of a sudden!!!
Months after police continually investigate this crime including the inside of the boys house and room" all of a sudden""
ALL OF A SUDDEN🤪😇🥳alarmingly shockingly police find blood everywhere!!
Woe my SWEET GOD OF GLORY!!@
WAIT?
POLICE "" ALL OF A SUDDEN"" FIND BLOOD EVERYWHERE?
AFTER MONTHS OF INVESTIGATING ?
YOU MEAN THEY DIDNT NOTICE ALL THAT BLOOD RIGHT AWAY?
OOO?
""""ALLLLL THAT BLOODDD!!! The blood is everywhere!! Why didnt we notice it!!? Woe my freaking GOD!!!""'
OKAY.
LISTEN PEOPLE.
HEED LOGIC.
Dont judge a book by its cover.
My question?
Simply this.
I find it strange that it took so long for anyone to notice blood stains.
In the house.
When the boy went missing quite a while back.
Are you telling me "" with that many blood stain evidences" in the house" right off the hop " someone couldnt figure this out sooner?
Something doesnt truly add up" there.
Something is clearly amiss there.
With the police and prosecutors of this case.
Maybe this woman is guilty.
Maybe.
I'm not saying she is or not.
I'm simply saying " no one actually saw her commit this crime.
And she says shes innocent.
Add the fact " no one noticed that many blood stains in the boys bedroom for this long?
That doesnt sound right on the part of the police.
Something is clearly wrong with that.
It's been a long time since this murder was said to take place.
And no one saw this woman drop any body off either.
In another place.
That's all I'm saying.
If you convict someone of a charge like this?
Make sure shes guilty.
Do they even have her finger prints on his body?
I wonder.
Something doesnt add up.
I hope this isnt a set up.
Maybe shes guilty maybe not.
I'm telling you " what I just said casts legitimate doubt.
You dont take that long to find supposed blood in the boys bedroom.
That's a long time to not find blood.
And then "" all of a sudden" find blood everywhere?
Think about it.
That's whacked.
Something clearly is wrong with that situation.
That's clearly enough time to set up blood from a pig in the bedroom.
To frame this woman.
I'm just saying.
Let the authorities charging this woman for murder explain that.
I'd like to hear it.
Shes always insisted shes innocent.
Ya know what?
I question whether she is.
Until the cops explain why the preceding contradictions exist I think people need to be cautious about this case.
It sounds like this woman is being framed.
In an incredibly weird way.
Why?
I dont know?
Maybe the father of the boy is friends with cops or court authorities.
Maybe the father or real mother have a vendetta against this woman.
Ya never know.
I'm just saying.
Before this happened was this woman ever known to be violent?
No.
I'm pretty sure the answer to that is "no.""
Be careful with this.
People.
Something doesnt fully
Add up.
Pure and simple.
🤔🤩😁🤯😮🤡😱🤪🐒🐸🐰😯😛🐶🤔😁🤯😮🤡😱💃🥳🐼🤨👹🥝🐧🦈🐡🦚🐋🐟🐠☺️🤔🤩😁🤯😮🤡😱
Let us summarize this once more.
For all to hear.
Dont judge a book by its cover.
My question?
Simply this.
They search for evidence of the missing boy for months?
AND ANYTHING TO CONNECT TTHIS WOMAN TO THE BOYS DEATH.
And then"" ALL OF A SUDDEN""" THEY SHOCKINGLY FIND BLOOD STAINS EVERYWHERE!
IN THE HOUSE? WHERE THE BOY AND WOMAN BOTH LIVE?
AT THE TIME?
WHATS THAT?
THAT DOESNT SOUND RIGHT?
WTF?
I find it strange that it took so long for anyone to notice blood stains.
In the house.
UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES.
When the boy went missing quite a while back.
THAT DOESNT SOUND LIKE ANYTHING BUT A FRAME JOB.
OR SET UP.
EXPLAIN THAT.
IN DETAIL.
I WANT TO HEAR AN EXPLANATION TO THAT.
RIGHT AWAY.
Are you telling me "" with that many blood stain evidences" in the house" right off the hop " someone couldnt figure this out sooner?
Something doesnt truly add up" there.
Something is clearly amiss there.
With the police and prosecutors of this case.
Maybe this woman is guilty.
Maybe.
I'm not saying she is or not.
I'm simply saying " no one actually saw her commit this crime.
And she says shes innocent.
Add the fact " no one noticed that many blood stains in the boys bedroom for this long?
That doesnt sound right on the part of the police.
Something is clearly wrong with that.
It's been a long time since this murder was said to take place.
And no one saw this woman drop any body off either.
In another place.
That's all I'm saying.
If you convict someone of a charge like this?
Make sure shes guilty.
Do they even have her finger prints on his body?
I wonder.
Something doesnt add up.
I hope this isnt a set up.
Maybe shes guilty maybe not.
I'm telling you " what I just said casts legitimate doubt.
You dont take that long to find supposed blood in the boys bedroom.
That's a long time to not find blood.
And then "" all of a sudden" find blood everywhere?
Think about it.
That's whacked.
Something clearly is wrong with that situation.
Even if such a theory is applied to some form of new technology.
Still...
The time space is too wide.
If your going to make an accusation like that " you dont wait months " before you search for blood remnants.
Obviously you dont.
Because that clearly gives people who possibly wish to frame this lady to much time to set up a scene with remnants of blood.
Whether pig blood or human blood. Or not.
The real Important
point is no one actually saw the woman kill the child.
And to wait months? To claim you've found blood?
Thats clearly enough time to set up blood from a pig in the bedroom.
For all anyone truly knows.
Regarding modern technology which may or may not be perfectly accurate when it comes to such a matter to begin with.
In order
To frame this woman.
Theres too many unsure questions.
And no body actually saw this woman kill this child.
I'm just saying.
Let the authorities charging this woman for murder explain that.
I'd like to hear it.😮
Shes always insisted shes innocent.
Ya know what?
I question whether she is.
Until the cops explain why the preceding contradictions exist I think people need to be cautious about this case.
It sounds like this woman is being framed.
In an incredibly weird way.
Why?
I dont know?
Maybe the father of the boy is friends with cops or court authorities.
Maybe the father or real mother have a vendetta against this woman.
Ya never know.
I'm just saying.
Before this happened was this woman ever known to be violent?
No.
I'm pretty sure the answer to that is "no.""
Be careful with this.
People.
Something doesnt fully
Add up.
Pure and simple.
🧟♂️👨🧟♀️🧞♂️🤡💂♀️🧕🧟♂️🤡🧙♂️🧞♂️🧝♀️🤡🧝♂️🧜♂️🧟♀️🧜♀️🏃♂️🙇♂️🤷♀️🥳🧟♀️👯♂️😱🏃♀️🥳🥴🕺🤡💃😱🧟♀️💃🧚♀️🧚♂️👹🤡👿🙀🧜♂️
😉🧞♂️🌝☄
Yet measuring facts is always logical too in addressing all subjects of this life.🙀⚡🤩☄
By which factor' I'll briefly state for now that
Hebrews 12: 28 to 29 matthew 7: 13 and 1st samuel 15: 3 to 33 speak of types of hell too. For people in this life.
Though.
Why?
Though?
Connecting simple dots connected to luke 4: 4von that note is always a logical premise for humans...
Obviously.🐯🐬🤡👍🌬🌪🐬🤡
Pure and simple.
In any matter of thislife.
To close this post I now say this.
In the attached below,
Within 12 hours they found one of the main Arabian hijackers wallets in all that debris?
And bush and his intelligence team connected that guy to Osama bin laden?
Within 12 hours?
Really?
In all that wreckage?
O look joe!
Heres a wallet of one of the terrorists.
The plane rhat exploded in flames upon impact of hitting the north tower.
Of course.
Yes.
Of course.
Come on?
Give me a break.
Bushes cabinet clearly set 9, 11 up.
Why?
Because bush got paid a lot of money to do so.
Because of the asbestos in the wtc buildings.
Billionaires who owned the buildings knew it would cost way more money to replace the asbestos.
So they hired some idiotic Arabian dummies to fly planes into the buildings instead..
And the guys who flew the planes into the buildings didnt even take lessons on how to land a jet air craft.
They only wanted lessons on how to fly planes.
They actually said that to their flying instructors.
That's actually factual.
That should have been a red flag right there.
Also,no billionaires or higher ups or managers were in the buildings when it happened.
Not one manager was in the building when the planes hit.
When usually a variety of managers were in their offices at that time of day.
That too is ridiculously weird.
Bush and his government plus a variety of billionaires did 9 11.
That's obvious.
And with many pay offs they hid their lie from the public.
Incredible.
Yet it's the only thing that makes sense.
When all the facts of 9 11 are analysed properly.
Obviously.
Pure and simple.
I close this comment now as follows.🙀⚡🤩
In summarizing these matters its reminds me of a person I knew in my childhood whose name was rockin ricky Roger's.
Who was often times in trouble with the law.🌋🐬🌬
After beating up his parents quite often.
During his teenage years.
The media caught wind of one of his charges.😱🌊🇮🇱
And printed an article on the charges.
Worded in the local news papers as follows.🧟♀️☄😮
ROCKIN RICKY 🤡☄🤪ROGERS GOES TOTALLY BERZERK . Seen here.😱
EASYTRUELOVE.BLOGSPOT.COM
. 🌊😱🌪SEE IT ON WEB CAM NEWS AT 11 pm.. alarming footage seen only on web cam.Dont miss your chance to see QHAT THIS STORY IS ALL ABOUT!. BE THERE👨🦰🤩🐥 OR BE SQUARE.😱🌊🤯☄😮🧟♀️
PURE BLESSINGS TO YA. 🤪🐬🌋 PEACE OUT.😱🌊🙊
EVERYBODY.🇮🇱😱🌊
😃😗😱🧟♂️🙀🥳
