Hi people.
Who read this blog website.
Listen I
Hope you are all doing quite well. Today.
Me?
I’m fine.
I’m fine.
Yet
Just for the record I thought I’d say this.
In simple linguistics this is a crime website.
So it pertains to crime.
That I analyse.
So on that note?
I deem the following factual information logical and neccacary to address for this blog website.
And that information shall be worded as follows.
To those who read this crime blog website.
Please note the following information.
Worded in this fashion.
For the appropriate sake of a sweet gloriously blessed record?
I wrote this to my cousin
Audrey.
In this life.
This information immediately addressed below.
And just for the record?
It’s an interesting story about the events that occurred to people in America in this life on September 11th 2001 ad.
9/11.
And because I feel it’s neccacary?
I thought maybe you should hear it.
Too.
Likewise.
On that note?
It goes like this.
Worded as follows.
O my dear cousin Audrey. What a strange life we live.
Huh?
With so many dangers.
In this life?
Right?
O my yes.
Audrey.
O my blessed cousin Audrey in Alberta Canada.
O my yes.
Audrey.
Let us try to trust in Jesus.
On that note.
Correct.?
O my yes.
As I write a blog website on crime in this life I address these words to you sweet Audrey.
My beloved sweet cousin in Alberta Canada.
O my yes.
And
On that note?
Speaking of note worthy information one should address on crime?
Listen to this Audrey.
O my yes.
Listen to this.
Are you listening?
Audrey?
I hope you are.
Because let me tell you something here and now on that note.
My lady.
O gosh yes.
Let me tell you a something right now.
On that subject in particular.
I will tell you now, my cousin Audrey and daughter to my uncle Klaus, just for the record,,,
Listen here now to this.
a true story that occurred in this life.
And I’ll word it as follows.
I was only in New York City once. When I was about 20 years in age.
In 1993 was it?
And for the record?
I arrived there from London Ontario canada the day after the first bombing of the World Trade Center.
In 1993.
If I recall correctly.
93.
Or 92.
One of those years is when it happened.
Which was the year I went obviously.
The first bombing occurred
In the ground parking lot of the right tower I believe.
Yet it might have been tower two .
So the place was on high alert… Meaning I didn’t get to go into the World Trade Center buildings.
They were closed.
But I did go up to the 72 floor of the Empire State Building. And I saw the other attractions in New York. It was weird arriving there and the tower had been attacked.
Because I had a strange premonition.
Of it.
On the grey hound bus I was travelling on to New York the day it happened. In 1993.
The reason why I say it was strange? A day before 9/11? I was back in London Ontario Canada.
And the morning of September 10th? 2001? I had a vividly clear horrific dream of planes hitting the towers. It was clear.
And it was the only morning of my entire life that I , while still technically asleep , was standing on my bed screaming , stop the planes!
Stop the planes.
I was pounding on my bedroom window. While screaming. While I was asleep.
The only thing that woke me up was my fist breaking through the window and shattering the glass.
I woke up standing on my bed pounding on a bedroom window screaming , stop my planes!!”’
On the morning of September 10th 2001. It was clearly a vision of planes hitting the World Trade Center towers.
So I was clearly warned in a dream it was gonna happen. Yet I only had 24 hours to warn anybody of that.
And who would have believed me anyways? If I tried to call the president of America for example? And told him I had a Christ given vision of the towers falling? Mr busy would have laughed at me.
And besides that truth? Have you people seen the conspiracy programs?
On. 9/11? Holy Jesus.
Their are a lot of facts in those programs that clearly warn everybody on earth that the American government hired a bunch of Arabic imbeciles to fly those planes into the towers.
And I mean it’s one solid fact after another.
No high ranking officials are working in the towers the day the planes hit.
Not one high ranking manager anywhere.
Yet every other day the world trade centres are open thousands are in the building at 7 am ?
And they found one of the Arabic idiots wallets and watches ?
In the rubble?
Afterwards ?
That had evidence inside the wallet that said the Arabic idiots were gonna do this !
And the wtc towers are built with asbestos?
Which was a real problem for the owners of the World Trade Center towers.
It was gonna cost billions to get the asbestos replaced?
If they could even do it?
And also the World Trade Center towers are not insured for 35 years?
Yet two weeks before the planes hit?
The towers are insuredd so?
O really ?
It’s known too
Those Arabic imbeciles who flew those planes into the towers took lessons to learn how to fly planes yet they took no lessons to learn how to land planes.
Ooo really😱
And many other serious matters too?
Witnesses who were there swear they heard bombs going off everywhere while the towers fell?
And it’s a known fact that steel beams in the towers do not melt or break at the temperature of jet fuel?
You need at least 15 degrees more heat to dissolve the steel beams in the wtc buildings.
Yet despite that fact strangely the steel beams easily fell regardless?
That means bombs were planted by the American government in the building to blow it up obviously.
And it’s a well known fact that world trade centre building tower seven had no plane hit it at all.
Yet witnesses there that day, just before tower seven fell, heard bombs exploding all around the building?
O really?
All facts verify the American government of the time along with the high ranking officials in the wtc buildings took down the World Trade Center buildings themselves…
So? That said? Wtf? You know?
I mean seriously?
Wtf?
Dear Audrey.
Everything I just said there is factual.
And that’s sort of scary.
You know?
https://youtu.be/WgSv1Z-Sybg
Now on to the case of a lady named Rachel.
Addressed in the above YouTube video?
Rachel had proof that sarah had threatened her life many times.
That's clearly a fact.
In this case.
So?
When this homicide detective says the police cant do anything about a threat, what does that mean?
Here?
Arent death threats against someone illegal in that area of the United states?
On that note?
As sarah threatened rachel with death many times originally speaking.
In this case..
Sarah was the catalyst of that .
I mean, really?
Isnt that clear proof that the police are somewhat to blame?
In this case.
As sarah and her friends hounded rachel.
In this matter.
At many turns.
My question?
On that note?
Why didnt the police ever talk to sarah?
About that.
To tell sarah to stop threatening rachel.
Because the police didnt do that?
That tells me " theirs a self defence, defence case .
For rachel.
Here.
If one summarizes all the facts of this case properly.
Also, in the climax to this case?
Same situation.
Sarah drove to rachel . As usual. In this case.
And threatened rachel.
As usual.
Violently.
That's clearly what goes on her.
I'm pretty sure, this tape? Their showing? In this video? Of the girl? Threatening the other girl?
I'm not entirely certain. But I'm pretty certain, that's sarah threatening to kill rachel.
Not the other way around.
Why this video has that backwards?
Hmm?
I could be wrong..but I dont think so.
As i
saw another video on this case. That goes into the facts of the case.
In detail.
And that video said sarah threatened rachel with death.
That way...
Maybe maybe after sarah threatened rachel , rachel around and did the same.
Maybe?
But I dont think that's the case.
The downloader of this video should check that..
Anyways
The other video goes into more precise details of who was the aggressor here.
And, generally speaking?
, it was sarah.
By far who was DERANGED and the aggressor.
Not rachel.
Sarah was the one Who instigated the fighting. Between them.Mostly.
In this case.
Before rachel started to, I suppose stupidly carry a knife, for self defence purposes.
Against sarah and her clearly violent idiot friends.
Who were all hanging up on rachel.
.in this case.
That's why I feel the sentence handed to rachel was a little too harsh.
For the most part Rachel tried for quite a while to avoid fighting sarah and the girls.
Who were clearly being bullies to rachel.
Saran did most of the instigating and threats.
In this case.
At least that's what I recall the other videos facts of the case as stating.
Just for the record.
So?
In this video?
Their not exactly giving the full facts of this case.
Obviously.
But in conclusion?
Just for the record?
this guy?
They were fighting over?
He didnt help the situation.
At all.
He was just being an idiot.
He wanted them to fight.
And a man doesnt do that.
If he truly cares about decency..
You choose one woman
And you dont let young ladies kill each other.
Over you.
It's that simple.
So?
Hes a goof.
On that note.
Of a truth'
He didnt really care about either of them.
At all.
Not really.
Their were pawns in a game to him.
Obviously , on that note.
All the facts of this case verify that statement to be correct.
Completely.
So?
Therefore, on that note,
Both of these girls are technically at fault.
In this situation.
Right?
Yes.
Obviously
They should have realized that he obviously was enjoying watching them stupidly fight over him.
In cat fights.
Therefore, that means hes clearly nothing but a goof.
And
On that note they should have both
Dumped him.
And moved on.
Pure and simple.
But
Anyways,
I'm pretty sure that's what I recall.
In the other video.
Uh huh.
Yep.
I'm
Pretty sure that's what the other video said.
.
And it's probably correct.
Because this video goes out of it's way to actually say it might not have all the facts of the case present..here.
So?
On that note,
What's that?.
Now for case two of this post.
People have to be cautious of that matter.
Woe my SWEET GOD OF GLORY!!@
WAIT?
POLICE "" ALL OF A SUDDEN"" FIND BLOOD EVERYWHERE?
AFTER MONTHS OF INVESTIGATING ?
YOU MEAN THEY DIDNT NOTICE ALL THAT BLOOD RIGHT AWAY?
OOO?
""""ALLLLL THAT BLOODDD!!! The blood is everywhere!! Why didnt we notice it!!? Woe my freaking GOD!!!""'
OKAY.
LISTEN PEOPLE.
HEED LOGIC.
Dont judge a book by its cover.
My question?
Simply this.
I find it strange that it took so long for anyone to notice blood stains.
In the house.
When the boy went missing quite a while back.
Are you telling me "" with that many blood stain evidences" in the house" right off the hop " someone couldnt figure this out sooner?
Something doesnt truly add up" there.
Something is clearly amiss there.
With the police and prosecutors of this case.
Maybe this woman is guilty.
Maybe.
I'm not saying she is or not.
I'm simply saying " no one actually saw her commit this crime.
And she says shes innocent.
Add the fact " no one noticed that many blood stains in the boys bedroom for this long?
That doesnt sound right on the part of the police.
Something is clearly wrong with that.
It's been a long time since this murder was said to take place.
And no one saw this woman drop any body off either.
In another place.
That's all I'm saying.
If you convict someone of a charge like this?
Make sure shes guilty.
Do they even have her finger prints on his body?
I wonder.
Something doesnt add up.
I hope this isnt a set up.
Maybe shes guilty maybe not.
I'm telling you " what I just said casts legitimate doubt.
You dont take that long to find supposed blood in the boys bedroom.
That's a long time to not find blood.
And then "" all of a sudden" find blood everywhere?
Think about it.
That's whacked.
Something clearly is wrong with that situation.
That's clearly enough time to set up blood from a pig in the bedroom.
To frame this woman.
I'm just saying.
Let the authorities charging this woman for murder explain that.
I'd like to hear it.
Shes always insisted shes innocent.
Ya know what?
I question whether she is.
Until the cops explain why the preceding contradictions exist I think people need to be cautious about this case.
It sounds like this woman is being framed.
In an incredibly weird way.
Why?
I dont know?
Maybe the father of the boy is friends with cops or court authorities.
Maybe the father or real mother have a vendetta against this woman.
Ya never know.
I'm just saying.
Before this happened was this woman ever known to be violent?
No.
I'm pretty sure the answer to that is "no.""
Be careful with this.
People.
Something doesnt fully
Add up.
Pure and simple.
🤔🤩😁🤯😮🤡😱🤪🐒🐸🐰😯😛🐶🤔😁🤯😮🤡😱💃🥳🐼🤨👹🥝🐧🦈🐡🦚🐋🐟🐠☺️🤔🤩😁🤯😮🤡😱
Let us summarize this once more.
For all to hear.
Dont judge a book by its cover.
My question?
Simply this.
They search for evidence of the missing boy for months?
AND ANYTHING TO CONNECT TTHIS WOMAN TO THE BOYS DEATH.
And then"" ALL OF A SUDDEN""" THEY SHOCKINGLY FIND BLOOD STAINS EVERYWHERE!
IN THE HOUSE? WHERE THE BOY AND WOMAN BOTH LIVE?
AT THE TIME?
WHATS THAT?
THAT DOESNT SOUND RIGHT?
WTF?
I find it strange that it took so long for anyone to notice blood stains.
In the house.
UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES.
When the boy went missing quite a while back.
THAT DOESNT SOUND LIKE ANYTHING BUT A FRAME JOB.
OR SET UP.
EXPLAIN THAT.
IN DETAIL.
I WANT TO HEAR AN EXPLANATION TO THAT.
RIGHT AWAY.
Are you telling me "" with that many blood stain evidences" in the house" right off the hop " someone couldnt figure this out sooner?
Something doesnt truly add up" there.
Something is clearly amiss there.
With the police and prosecutors of this case.
Maybe this woman is guilty.
Maybe.
I'm not saying she is or not.
I'm simply saying " no one actually saw her commit this crime.
And she says shes innocent.
Add the fact " no one noticed that many blood stains in the boys bedroom for this long?
That doesnt sound right on the part of the police.
Something is clearly wrong with that.
It's been a long time since this murder was said to take place.
And no one saw this woman drop any body off either.
In another place.
That's all I'm saying.
If you convict someone of a charge like this?
Make sure shes guilty.
Do they even have her finger prints on his body?
I wonder.
Something doesnt add up.
I hope this isnt a set up.
Maybe shes guilty maybe not.
I'm telling you " what I just said casts legitimate doubt.
You dont take that long to find supposed blood in the boys bedroom.
That's a long time to not find blood.
And then "" all of a sudden" find blood everywhere?
Think about it.
That's whacked.
Something clearly is wrong with that situation.
Even if such a theory is applied to some form of new technology.
Still...
The time space is too wide.
If your going to make an accusation like that " you dont wait months " before you search for blood remnants.
Obviously you dont.
Because that clearly gives people who possibly wish to frame this lady to much time to set up a scene with remnants of blood.
Whether pig blood or human blood. Or not.
The real Important
point is no one actually saw the woman kill the child.
And to wait months? To claim you've found blood?
Thats clearly enough time to set up blood from a pig in the bedroom.
For all anyone truly knows.
Regarding modern technology which may or may not be perfectly accurate when it comes to such a matter to begin with.
In order
To frame this woman.
Theres too many unsure questions.
And no body actually saw this woman kill this child.
I'm just saying.
Let the authorities charging this woman for murder explain that.
I'd like to hear it.😮
Shes always insisted shes innocent.
Ya know what?
I question whether she is.
Until the cops explain why the preceding contradictions exist I think people need to be cautious about this case.
It sounds like this woman is being framed.
In an incredibly weird way.
Why?
I dont know?
Maybe the father of the boy is friends with cops or court authorities.
Maybe the father or real mother have a vendetta against this woman.
Ya never know.
I'm just saying.
Before this happened was this woman ever known to be violent?
No.
I'm pretty sure the answer to that is "no.""
Be careful with this.
People.
Something doesnt fully
Add up.
Pure and simple.
🧟♂️👨🧟♀️🧞♂️🤡💂♀️🧕🧟♂️🤡🧙♂️🧞♂️🧝♀️🤡🧝♂️🧜♂️🧟♀️🧜♀️🏃♂️🙇♂️🤷♀️🥳🧟♀️👯♂️😱🏃♀️🥳🥴🕺🤡💃😱🧟♀️💃🧚♀️🧚♂️👹🤡👿🙀🧜♂️
https://youtu.be/xPKmwjF3MiI
Did they not say " no signs of rape?
On the first victim?
In this said video.
Attached here.
To this second part of this addressed post.
I think they did.
Early on? In the video?
I'm not sure.
But I think they did.
So?
That's an important concept to note.
Presently.
Regarding a subject I am obviously addressing in this second half of this post.
Why?
Why is that important to note ?
Think about it.
If the readers can not figure that out yet I will proceed to give an explanation to that statement.
Worded as follows.
" at around the 25 minute mark "in this same video " I think they said he did rape her.
So?
What sort of contradiction is that?
A serious concept to note ..clearly.
Regarding this video.
Exactly.
Yes.
Exactly.
Right.
Precisely.
Especially considering " their accusing him of rape and murder " through a method that the regular public has no real evidence is trustworthy.
I'll admit I'm not sure if dna is a method of deceit deployed by evil spirits.
In human form.
I dont know?
Connected to 2nd corinthians 11" 13 to 15 and revelation 16: 13 to 14.
Maybe it's not.
Maybe it is.
I dont know.
I do know it doesbt really match up with what jesus teaches humanity in matthew 5: 17.
That's pretty well obvious.
Whether dna is a legitimate way to solve real crimes is open for debate.
May be it can help.
I'm not saying it cant.
Anything's possible.
Through luke 1: 37.
My point though?
To this comment I make here?
Simply this.
Im just saying; " why does the preceding contradiction addressed in this video exist?
Regarding the contradiction I refer to here.
In this video.
That's my point.
Regarding the authorities saying the first victim wasnt raped.
And then accusing this guy of raping her.
And saying hes the perpetrator.
How could he have raped the first victim then?
Im pretty sure I'm right.
In this contradiction.
I just addressed.
But " you know what? "" I'll double check.
Just to see.
🤡😱⚡🤪😗🥳🙀🐒🙊😃😂🐶👹☄🌪🌝🌈🚖🚒🚔🌄😱🌪💒⛩🙊🤡♨️🚖😂🤪😃🙊😱😱🤡⚡🤪😗🥳🙀😱
Yep.
Okay.
I just checked.
At the 24 : 30 mark of the video.
They clearly say he raped the first victim.
But earlier on in the video they clearly go out of their way to say the first victim " miss sims" ultimately was not raped.
So?
I'm not saying this guys innocent or guilty.
How do I know?
I'm just saying I know dna evidence does not fully align with the teachings of jesus christ in matthew 5: 17 to 20 of christianity.
And " to have a strange contradiction like that exist in police work? Here?
Not cool.
If he is innocent.
How truly reliable is dna?
I dont know?
I'd like to study the procedure.
I've never studied the procedure.
I've only studied what jesus taught.
And i do suspect the words of jesus " located in matthew 5: 17 to 20?
Of christianity?
That would be a far more perfect way to solve human crimes.
Jesus and moses never mention dna.
In the mosaic law.
So?
I'm just saying.
Nobody saw this guy commit the crimes.
Maybe he did.
Could be.
My point though?
Police procedures on laws in todays world do not match with what jesus teaches humans.
At all.
Even finger prints dont really align with what jesus teaches humans in matthew 5: 17 to 20.
It aligns with revelation 16: 13 to 14 of christianity.
Regarding devils and miracles.
I'm not saying it doesnt work.
I didnt say that.
I said it's not truly what jesus himself teaches humanity.
Kind of like faith.
And hebrews 11: 6.
So?
Be careful.
In connection to isiah 5: 20
And jeremiah 17: 5.
Regarding evil spirits masquerading as humans.
2nd corinthians 11: 13 to 15 says evil spirits have the power through suspended time vortexes to take on human forms.
And masquarqde as mortals.
In this time frame of humanity.
All of christianity " in summary" makes that clear.
Right?
So?
Try to make sense.
I'd say that's good advice.
Isnt it?
Obviously it is.
Now..
Regarding the following post I have this ultimately VERACIOUSLY to say.
To ridiculous hypocritical Blogger authority figures.
Note this:
YOU WANT TO WASTE MY TIMEWITH BACK AND FORTH ABSOLUTE HYPOCRITICAL DELIBERATE CRAZINESS?
CONNECTED TO HEBREWS6: 4 TO 6?
YOU WANT TO HIDE THE UNFORGIVABLE DELIBERATE HYPOCRITICAL INIQUITIES OF ALL HUMAN HOVERNMENTS ON EARTH TODAY?
THROUGH SUCH DELIBERaTE CRAZY BACK AND FORTH LUKEWARM OBVIOUS DECEITFUL NONSENSE?
OKAY.
THATS ENOUGH.
TO BLOGGER OFFICIALS.
THE TWO TESTAMENTS OF CHRISTIANITY INVOKED IN MATTHEW 24: 51 AND PSALM 50: 22 NOW APPLY TO YOU.
BY WAY OF THE TWO TESTAMENTS OF CHRISTIANITY IINVOKEDHERE BELOW.
MARK 9: 42 AND MATTHEW 18: 7.
IT IS BECAUSE OF IDIOTIC AUTHORITYFIGURES AT BLOGGER
THAT CORONA VIRUS IS PRESENT THROUGHOUT THE EARTH PRESENTLY.
AND THE MORE YOUHIDE THE REAL TRUTH OF MY WORDS FROM HUMANITY THE WORSE SUCH A DISEASE WILL GET FOR ALL OF EARTH PRESENT EVIL INHANITANTS.
AS PSALM 1 AND MATTHEW5: 17 CONNECT TO DEUTERONOMY 28: 58 TO 59 PROPERLY.
YOU TOTAL HYPOCRITES AT BLOGGER.COM.
OBVIOUSLY YOUR HHYPOCRITES. AND ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
.
ON THAT NOTE.
YOUR
BAck and forth deliberate defiance of the holy spirit of CHRISTIANITYS instructions addressed through the lord jesus christ in luke 12: 1 to 3 as well as countless other instructions of CHRISTIANITYS holy spirit aligning 2nd peter 1: 19 to 21 "" on your parts"" i now find offensive .
Look closely at mark 3: 29 .
And do not hide real truth from humanity.
To hide truth allows corrupt beings the liberty to murder innocent beings.
And to hide truth allows infinite hypocrites the liberty to murder mother earth forever.
Tattoo hebrews 6: 4 to 6 accross your foreheads.
On that note.
So shall it be soon.
ON CHRISTIANITYSDAY OF JUDGMENT.
WHEN I CALL THE GOD " MERCURY" TO APPEAR IN THE HUMAN FORM AND LIKENESS OF GHENGHIS KHAN " TO BRING 2ND ESDRAS 13 'S PROPHESY TO COMMENCEMENT.
THEN 2ND PETER 3' S PROPHESIES.
THEN REVELATION 21: 1 TO 3.
ALL BECAUSE VERY DELIBERWTE HYPOCRITES ON EARTH COULD NOT HONOR CHRISTS SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED TO LUKE 12: 1 TO 3.
YOU OFFEND ME NOW.
WITH YOUR LUKEWARM STANCE ON EXPOSING EVIL BEINGS FOR THE SAKE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS.
SO?
NOW THERES ONLY THIS.
HUMANS HAVE NOT RECORDED TIME PROPERLY.
REGARDING THE TIMES AND SEASONS.
IN NUMEROUS FACETS.
INCLUDING THE RIDICULOUS SCIENTIFIC TEACHING THAT STATES HUMANS MUST ASSIGN 365 DAYS TO A HUMAN YEAR.
GOD SAID 336 DAYS ARE ASSIGNED TO EACH YEAR..
NOT 365 DAYS ASSIGNED...
THEREFORE HUMANS FOOLISHLY DO NOT REALIZE THAT " IN REAL CHRISTIANTIME LINES" HUMANS HAVE NOT REACHED NOSTRADAMUS'S MOST FAMOUS VATICINAL CHRISTIAN ASSIGNED OUTLET PROPHESY.
C10Q72.
Obviously when the facts of such a scenario are evaluated clearly humanity has not reached the year 1999 ad and seven months.
I WILL SOONCALL THE HOLY CHRISTIAN DEITY MERCURY ALIAS HERMESTRUE SOBRIQUET JANUS " IN THE FORM OF GHENGHIS KHAN TO DEAL OUT A VERY NECCACARY RIGHTEOUS HAND TO THISERA OF FILTHY DECEITFUL HUMAN HYPOCRITES.
AS C4Q28 ALSO WARNS HUMANS.
CONNECTED TOREVELATION 20: 7 TO 10!
THE GOD MERCURY IN THE FORM OF GHENGHISKHAN WILL SOON INTRODUCE EARTHS PRES3NT DEVILISH INHABITANTS TO THEHOLY FIRESADDRESSED BY CHRISTIANITYSHOLY SPIRIT THROIGH NOSTRADAMUß .
IN C4Q28 OF NOSTRADAMUS'S WORDS TO HUMANS IN THIS LIFE.
AS SAINT JOHN ALSO GIVES HOLY WARNING TO HYPOCRITES TODAY.
IN REVELATION 20: 7 TO 10.
WHERE SAINT JOHN STATES THE FOLLOWING TRUTH.
"" AND FIRECAME DOWN FROM GOD OUT OF HEAVEN. AND D3VOURED THEM ALL.
CONNECTED TO 2ND ESDRAS 13.
THROUGH 2ND PETER 3: 7 TO 17.
AND EZEKIEL 38: 10 TO 22.
THEN A NEW HEAVEN AND NEW EARTHWILL APPEAR.
WHICH OBVIOUSLY MEANS ALL JEWS TODAY WILL SUFFER THESAME FATEAS EVERYONEELSE.
THE PROPHESY ADDRESS3D IN ROMANS 11: 25 CLEARLY APPLIES TO " AFTER THEGOLDEN AGE DIES.
REGARDING WHAT ENOCH WARNS HUMANS OF IN 2ND ENOCH 33: 1 TO 12.
OBVIOUSLY.
THAT PROPHESY DOES NOT APPLY TO THE OBVIOUS PHONEY JEWS OF THIS ERA.
BE WARNED OF THAT TRUTH.
ASISIAH 56: 1 TO 7 WARNS ALL.
YOU REALIZE I COULD HAVE STOPPED SUCH A PROPHESY FROM OCCURRING.
IF YOU DID NOT STUPIDLY RESPOND TO ME THE WAY YOU JUST DID.
IN THE PREVIOUS EMAIL.
Thank you.
IN TRUE SINCERITY TOWARDS VERIDICAL CONCEPTS APPLIED TO LIFE
I NOW SIGN THIS LETTER AS FOLLOWS.
THE TRUE ESSENCE OF C10Q65 AND C5Q79 OF THE QUATRAINS OF NOSTRADAMUS.
JOYFULLY- JOYFULLY. This is coelus trying to save mother earth from clear murderous unholy bitches and bastards on earth today.
😉🧞♂️🌝☄
https://youtu.be/7h73and9oho
These 😱🌊🇮🇱🧟♀️
People go to a type of hell. It's TRUE.
Yet measuring facts is always logical too in addressing all subjects of this life.🙀⚡🤩☄
By which factor' I'll briefly state for now that
Hebrews 12: 28 to 29 matthew 7: 13 and 1st samuel 15: 3 to 33 speak of types of hell too. For people in this life.
Though.
Why?
Though?
Connecting simple dots connected to luke 4: 4von that note is always a logical premise for humans...
Obviously.🐯🐬🤡👍🌬🌪🐬🤡
Pure and simple.
In any matter of thislife.
To close this post I now say this.
In the attached below,
The building named wtc building 7 hadn't fallen yet?
Regarding 9 11?
Yet, according to Jesse ventura
, in a nice telephone call to England some politicians as well as news casters were claiming building seven had fallen . they were claiming building seven fell?
A half an hour before it fell?
In a recorded conversation?
Oooh?
Okay.
Well.
And many witnesses claimed to hear loud explosions echoing all through building seven.
Just before it fell to the ground.
Strange.
Because building seven wasnt hit by a plane.
It was basically undamaged.
So why did it fall?
Did building seven grow invisible arms which reached out accross New York, to some army barracks to grab some bombs and explosives in order to blow itself up?
I mean,seriously.
Did building seven miraculously do that?
And blow itself up?
Hey.
I'm just curious.
Interesting.
Within 12 hours they found one of the main Arabian hijackers wallets in all that debris?
And bush and his intelligence team connected that guy to Osama bin laden?
Within 12 hours?
Really?
In all that wreckage?
O look joe!
Heres a wallet of one of the terrorists.
The plane rhat exploded in flames upon impact of hitting the north tower.
Of course.
Yes.
Of course.
Come on?
Give me a break.
Bushes cabinet clearly set 9, 11 up.
Why?
Because bush got paid a lot of money to do so.
Because of the asbestos in the wtc buildings.
Billionaires who owned the buildings knew it would cost way more money to replace the asbestos.
So they hired some idiotic Arabian dummies to fly planes into the buildings instead..
And the guys who flew the planes into the buildings didnt even take lessons on how to land a jet air craft.
They only wanted lessons on how to fly planes.
They actually said that to their flying instructors.
That's actually factual.
That should have been a red flag right there.
Also,no billionaires or higher ups or managers were in the buildings when it happened.
Not one manager was in the building when the planes hit.
When usually a variety of managers were in their offices at that time of day.
That too is ridiculously weird.
Bush and his government plus a variety of billionaires did 9 11.
That's obvious.
And with many pay offs they hid their lie from the public.
Incredible.
Yet it's the only thing that makes sense.
When all the facts of 9 11 are analysed properly.
Obviously.
Pure and simple.
Watch "Ventura's take on 9/11: 'They wanted it to happen'" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/56OhXUuY2RE
I close this comment now as follows.🙀⚡🤩
In summarizing these matters its reminds me of a person I knew in my childhood whose name was rockin ricky Roger's.
Who was often times in trouble with the law.🌋🐬🌬
After beating up his parents quite often.
During his teenage years.
The media caught wind of one of his charges.😱🌊🇮🇱
And printed an article on the charges.
Worded in the local news papers as follows.🧟♀️☄😮
ROCKIN RICKY 🤡☄🤪ROGERS GOES TOTALLY BERZERK . Seen here.😱
EASYTRUELOVE.BLOGSPOT.COM
. 🌊😱🌪SEE IT ON WEB CAM NEWS AT 11 pm.. alarming footage seen only on web cam.Dont miss your chance to see QHAT THIS STORY IS ALL ABOUT!. BE THERE👨🦰🤩🐥 OR BE SQUARE.😱🌊🤯☄😮🧟♀️
PURE BLESSINGS TO YA. 🤪🐬🌋 PEACE OUT.😱🌊🙊
EVERYBODY.🇮🇱😱🌊
😃😗😱🧟♂️🙀🥳
